» Articles » PMID: 24403987

Empirical Chemosensitivity Testing in a Spheroid Model of Ovarian Cancer Using a Microfluidics-based Multiplex Platform

Overview
Date 2014 Jan 10
PMID 24403987
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The use of biomarkers to infer drug response in patients is being actively pursued, yet significant challenges with this approach, including the complicated interconnection of pathways, have limited its application. Direct empirical testing of tumor sensitivity would arguably provide a more reliable predictive value, although it has garnered little attention largely due to the technical difficulties associated with this approach. We hypothesize that the application of recently developed microtechnologies, coupled to more complex 3-dimensional cell cultures, could provide a model to address some of these issues. As a proof of concept, we developed a microfluidic device where spheroids of the serous epithelial ovarian cancer cell line TOV112D are entrapped and assayed for their chemoresponse to carboplatin and paclitaxel, two therapeutic agents routinely used for the treatment of ovarian cancer. In order to index the chemoresponse, we analyzed the spatiotemporal evolution of the mortality fraction, as judged by vital dyes and confocal microscopy, within spheroids subjected to different drug concentrations and treatment durations inside the microfluidic device. To reflect microenvironment effects, we tested the effect of exogenous extracellular matrix and serum supplementation during spheroid formation on their chemotherapeutic response. Spheroids displayed augmented chemoresistance in comparison to monolayer culturing. This resistance was further increased by the simultaneous presence of both extracellular matrix and high serum concentration during spheroid formation. Following exposure to chemotherapeutics, cell death profiles were not uniform throughout the spheroid. The highest cell death fraction was found at the center of the spheroid and the lowest at the periphery. Collectively, the results demonstrate the validity of the approach, and provide the basis for further investigation of chemotherapeutic responses in ovarian cancer using microfluidics technology. In the future, such microdevices could provide the framework to assay drug sensitivity in a timeframe suitable for clinical decision making.

Citing Articles

Exploiting Cancer Dormancy Signaling Mechanisms in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Through Spheroid and Organoid Analysis.

Tomas E, Valdes Y, Davis J, Kolendowski B, Buensuceso A, DiMattia G Cells. 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 39851561 PMC: 11764263. DOI: 10.3390/cells14020133.


Insights into high-grade serous carcinoma pathobiology using three-dimensional culture model systems.

Tomas E, Shepherd T J Ovarian Res. 2023; 16(1):70.

PMID: 37038202 PMC: 10088149. DOI: 10.1186/s13048-023-01145-x.


In Vitro Models of Ovarian Cancer: Bridging the Gap between Pathophysiology and Mechanistic Models.

Lopez E, Kamboj S, Chen C, Wang Z, Kellouche S, Leroy-Dudal J Biomolecules. 2023; 13(1).

PMID: 36671488 PMC: 9855568. DOI: 10.3390/biom13010103.


The Applications and Challenges of the Development of Tumor Microenvironment Chips.

Johnson A, Reimer S, Childres R, Cupp G, Kohs T, McCarty O Cell Mol Bioeng. 2023; 16(1):3-21.

PMID: 36660587 PMC: 9842840. DOI: 10.1007/s12195-022-00755-7.


Droplet microfluidic devices for organized stem cell differentiation into germ cells: capabilities and challenges.

Hayaei Tehrani R, Hajari M, Ghorbaninejad Z, Esfandiari F Biophys Rev. 2022; 13(6):1245-1271.

PMID: 35059040 PMC: 8724463. DOI: 10.1007/s12551-021-00907-5.


References
1.
Cooke S, Ng C, Melnyk N, Garcia M, Hardcastle T, Temple J . Genomic analysis of genetic heterogeneity and evolution in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Oncogene. 2010; 29(35):4905-13. PMC: 2933510. DOI: 10.1038/onc.2010.245. View

2.
Sigurdsson V, Hilmarsdottir B, Sigmundsdottir H, Fridriksdottir A, Ringner M, Villadsen R . Endothelial induced EMT in breast epithelial cells with stem cell properties. PLoS One. 2011; 6(9):e23833. PMC: 3167828. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023833. View

3.
Roos W, Kaina B . DNA damage-induced cell death by apoptosis. Trends Mol Med. 2006; 12(9):440-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2006.07.007. View

4.
Bast Jr R, Hennessy B, Mills G . The biology of ovarian cancer: new opportunities for translation. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009; 9(6):415-28. PMC: 2814299. DOI: 10.1038/nrc2644. View

5.
Mankoo P, Shen R, Schultz N, Levine D, Sander C . Time to recurrence and survival in serous ovarian tumors predicted from integrated genomic profiles. PLoS One. 2011; 6(11):e24709. PMC: 3207809. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024709. View