» Articles » PMID: 28325895

Simulation-assisted Design of Microfluidic Sample Traps for Optimal Trapping and Culture of Non-adherent Single Cells, Tissues, and Spheroids

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2017 Mar 23
PMID 28325895
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This work focuses on modelling design and operation of "microfluidic sample traps" (MSTs). MSTs regroup a widely used class of microdevices that incorporate wells, recesses or chambers adjacent to a channel to individually trap, culture and/or release submicroliter 3D tissue samples ranging from simple cell aggregates and spheroids, to ex vivo tissue samples and other submillimetre-scale tissue models. Numerous MST designs employing various trapping mechanisms have been proposed in the literature, spurring the development of 3D tissue models for drug discovery and personalized medicine. Yet, there lacks a general framework to optimize trapping stability, trapping time, shear stress, and sample metabolism. Herein, the effects of hydrodynamics and diffusion-reaction on tissue viability and device operation are investigated using analytical and finite element methods with systematic parametric sweeps over independent design variables chosen to correspond to the four design degrees of freedom. Combining different results, we show that, for a spherical tissue of diameter d < 500 μm, the simplest, closest to optimal trap shape is a cube of dimensions w equal to twice the tissue diameter: w = 2d. Furthermore, to sustain tissues without perfusion, available medium volume per trap needs to be 100× the tissue volume to ensure optimal metabolism for at least 24 hours.

Citing Articles

Capacity and limitations of microfluidic flow to increase solute transport in three-dimensional cell cultures.

Bonneuil W, Katiyar N, Tenje M, Bagheri S J R Soc Interface. 2025; 22(222):20240463.

PMID: 39875093 PMC: 11774591. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0463.


Pixelated Microfluidics for Drug Screening on Tumour Spheroids and Ex Vivo Microdissected Tumour Explants.

Dorrigiv D, Goyette P, St-Georges-Robillard A, Mes-Masson A, Gervais T Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(4).

PMID: 36831403 PMC: 9954565. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041060.


Spheroid Engineering in Microfluidic Devices.

Tevlek A, Kecili S, Ozcelik O, Kulah H, Tekin H ACS Omega. 2023; 8(4):3630-3649.

PMID: 36743071 PMC: 9893254. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c06052.


Surface Optimization and Design Adaptation toward Spheroid Formation On-Chip.

Azizipour N, Avazpour R, Sawan M, Ajji A, Rosenzweig D Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(9).

PMID: 35590879 PMC: 9104470. DOI: 10.3390/s22093191.


Uniform Tumor Spheroids on Surface-Optimized Microfluidic Biochips for Reproducible Drug Screening and Personalized Medicine.

Azizipour N, Avazpour R, Weber M, Sawan M, Ajji A, Rosenzweig D Micromachines (Basel). 2022; 13(4).

PMID: 35457892 PMC: 9028696. DOI: 10.3390/mi13040587.


References
1.
Grist S, Nasseri S, Poon T, Roskelley C, Cheung K . On-chip clearing of arrays of 3-D cell cultures and micro-tissues. Biomicrofluidics. 2016; 10(4):044107. PMC: 4958101. DOI: 10.1063/1.4959031. View

2.
Venkatasubramanian R, Henson M, Forbes N . Integrating cell-cycle progression, drug penetration and energy metabolism to identify improved cancer therapeutic strategies. J Theor Biol. 2008; 253(1):98-117. PMC: 2517579. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.02.016. View

3.
Ameri S, Singh P, Sonkusale S . Utilization of graphene electrode in transparent microwell arrays for high throughput cell trapping and lysis. Biosens Bioelectron. 2014; 61:625-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2014.05.067. View

4.
Chisti Y . Hydrodynamic damage to animal cells. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2001; 21(2):67-110. DOI: 10.1080/20013891081692. View

5.
Lee M, Shin J, Bae C, Choi S, Park J . Label-free cancer cell separation from human whole blood using inertial microfluidics at low shear stress. Anal Chem. 2013; 85(13):6213-8. DOI: 10.1021/ac4006149. View