» Articles » PMID: 24402399

Aging Society and Gerontechnology: a Solution for an Independent Living?

Overview
Date 2014 Jan 10
PMID 24402399
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent studies report that the majority of older adults wish to live in their own homes, for as long as possible. This creates a growing interest in technologies to enable older people to remain living independently at home. The purpose of this article is to provide a narrative review of current technology appropriate for older adults' home use. The key research questions were as follow: 1- What is the evidence demonstrating that gerontechnologies are effective in enabling independent living? 2- What are devices designed specifically for frail elderly persons ? Several publications were identified about devices targeting social isolation (videophonic communication, affective orthotic devices or companion-type robots, personal emergency response systems [security]), autonomy loss (technologies for maintenance of autonomy in the activities of daily living) and cognitive disorders (cognitive orthotics, wandering management systems, telemonitoring). Very few articles dealt specifically with the frail older person. In particular, there was extremely limited evidence on use and efficacy of these devices within this population. There is a need to obtain a consensus on definition of the technologies, and also to revisit work strategies and develop innovative business models. To meet this goal, we need to create a network of technological companies, aging services organizations, end-users, academics, and government representatives to explore the real needs of the frail older population and to develop and validate new devices promoting aging at home.

Citing Articles

Navigating Through Innovation in Elderly's Health: A Scoping Review of Digital Health Interventions.

Hirmas-Adauy M, Castillo-Laborde C, Awad C, Jasmen A, Mattoli M, Molina X Public Health Rev. 2025; 45:1607756.

PMID: 39749218 PMC: 11693459. DOI: 10.3389/phrs.2024.1607756.


Technology-based interventions on burden of older adults' informal caregivers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Zhou Y, Bai Z, Wan K, Qin T, He R, Xie C BMC Geriatr. 2024; 24(1):398.

PMID: 38704539 PMC: 11070124. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05018-w.


Impact of digital assistive technologies on the quality of life for people with dementia: a scoping review.

Schneider C, Nissen M, Kowatsch T, Vinay R BMJ Open. 2024; 14(2):e080545.

PMID: 38341210 PMC: 10862336. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080545.


Characteristics and Range of Reviews About Technologies for Aging in Place: Scoping Review of Reviews.

Bergschold J, Gunnes M, Eide A, Lassemo E JMIR Aging. 2024; 7:e50286.

PMID: 38252472 PMC: 10845034. DOI: 10.2196/50286.


Understanding the Value of a Proactive Telecare System in Supporting Older Adults' Independence at Home: Qualitative Interview Study Among Key Interest Groups.

Fothergill L, Holland C, Latham Y, Hayes N J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e47997.

PMID: 38096023 PMC: 10732490. DOI: 10.2196/47997.


References
1.
Miskelly F . A novel system of electronic tagging in patients with dementia and wandering. Age Ageing. 2004; 33(3):304-6. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afh084. View

2.
Savenstedt S, Zingmark K, Sandman P . Video-phone communication with cognitively impaired elderly patients. J Telemed Telecare. 2004; 9 Suppl 2:S52-4. DOI: 10.1258/135763303322596264. View

3.
Sixsmith A . An evaluation of an intelligent home monitoring system. J Telemed Telecare. 2000; 6(2):63-72. DOI: 10.1258/1357633001935059. View

4.
Bourke A, Van de Ven P, Gamble M, OConnor R, Murphy K, Bogan E . Evaluation of waist-mounted tri-axial accelerometer based fall-detection algorithms during scripted and continuous unscripted activities. J Biomech. 2010; 43(15):3051-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.07.005. View

5.
Schulz R, Burgio L, Burns R, Eisdorfer C, Gallagher-Thompson D, Gitlin L . Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health (REACH): overview, site-specific outcomes, and future directions. Gerontologist. 2003; 43(4):514-20. PMC: 2579756. DOI: 10.1093/geront/43.4.514. View