» Articles » PMID: 34721223

Reward Expectation Differentially Modulates Global and Local Spatial Working Memory Accuracy

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2021 Nov 1
PMID 34721223
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although it has been suggested that reward expectation affects the performance of spatial working memory tasks, controversial results have been found in previous experiments. Hence, it is still unclear to what extent reward expectation has an effect on working memory. To clarify this question, a memory-guided saccade task was applied, in which participants were instructed to retain and reconstruct a temporospatial sequence of four locations by moving their eyes in each trial. The global- and local-level spatial working memory accuracies were calculated to determine the reward effect on the global and local level of processing in spatial working memory tasks. Although high reward expectation enhanced the encoding of spatial information, the percentage of trials in which the cued location was correctly fixated decreased with increment of reward expectation. The reconstruction of the global temporospatial sequence was enhanced by reward expectation, whereas the local reconstruction performance was not affected by reward. Furthermore, the improvements in local representations of uncued locations and local sequences were at the cost of the representation of cued locations. The results suggest that the reward effect on spatial working memory is modulated by the level of processing, which supports the flexible resource theory during maintenance.

Citing Articles

Evidence for the Beneficial Effect of Reward on Working Memory: A Meta-Analytic Study.

Wang W, Yan X, He X, Qian J J Intell. 2024; 12(9).

PMID: 39330467 PMC: 11433210. DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence12090088.


The effect of reward expectation on working memory of emotional faces under different levels of cognitive load: an ERP study.

Gao T, Liu X, Geng W, Yan C, Wu M, Yang L Exp Brain Res. 2024; 242(3):769-780.

PMID: 38310175 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-023-06776-6.


Reward and loss incentives improve spatial working memory by shaping trial-by-trial posterior frontoparietal signals.

Cho Y, Moujaes F, Schleifer C, Starc M, Ji J, Santamauro N Neuroimage. 2022; 254:119139.

PMID: 35346841 PMC: 9264479. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119139.

References
1.
Klink P, Jeurissen D, Theeuwes J, Denys D, Roelfsema P . Working memory accuracy for multiple targets is driven by reward expectation and stimulus contrast with different time-courses. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):9082. PMC: 5567292. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08608-4. View

2.
Marquand A, De Simoni S, ODaly O, Williams S, Mourao-Miranda J, Mehta M . Pattern classification of working memory networks reveals differential effects of methylphenidate, atomoxetine, and placebo in healthy volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011; 36(6):1237-47. PMC: 3079849. DOI: 10.1038/npp.2011.9. View

3.
Unsworth N, Robison M . Individual differences in the allocation of attention to items in working memory: Evidence from pupillometry. Psychon Bull Rev. 2014; 22(3):757-65. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0747-6. View

4.
Miller G . The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev. 1956; 63(2):81-97. View

5.
Pochon J, Levy R, Fossati P, Lehericy S, Poline J, Pillon B . The neural system that bridges reward and cognition in humans: an fMRI study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(8):5669-74. PMC: 122829. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.082111099. View