» Articles » PMID: 24332382

Clinical Biomechanics of Instability Related to Total Knee Arthroplasty

Overview
Date 2013 Dec 17
PMID 24332382
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Tibiofemoral instability is a common reason for total knee arthroplasty failure, and may be attributed to soft tissue deficiency and incorrect ligament balancing. There are many different designs of implant with varying levels of constraint to overcome this instability; however there is little advice for surgeons to assess which is suitable for a specific patient, and soft tissue balance testing during arthroplasty is very subjective.

Method: The current theories on primary and secondary soft tissue restraints to anterior/posterior, varus/valgus, and internal/external rotational motion of the knee are discussed. The paper reviews biomechanics literature to evaluate instability in the intact and implanted knee.

Findings: The paper highlights important intra- and extra-capsular structures in the knee and describes the techniques used by clinicians to assess instability perioperatively. In vitro cadaveric studies were found to be a very useful tool in comparing different implants and contributions of different soft tissues.

Interpretation: In vitro cadaveric studies can be utilised in helping less experienced surgeons with soft tissue releases and determining the correct implant. For this to happen, more biomechanical studies must be done to show the impact of release sequences on implanted cadavers, as well as determining if increasingly constrained implants restore the stability of the knee to pre-deficient conditions.

Citing Articles

Difference in implant design affects midflexion rotational laxity in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a computer navigation study.

Tsuda T, Hino K, Kutsuna T, Watamori K, Kinoshita T, Takao M J Exp Orthop. 2023; 10(1):85.

PMID: 37605070 PMC: 10441849. DOI: 10.1186/s40634-023-00652-6.


Rotating Hinge Prosthesis for Primary and Revision Knee Arthroplasty: Comparison and Indications.

Neuhaus H, Maier K Biomed Res Int. 2022; 2022:9930675.

PMID: 35136828 PMC: 8818410. DOI: 10.1155/2022/9930675.


VERIFICATION OF MANUAL DIGITIZATION METHODS DURING EXPERIMENTAL SIMULATION OF KNEE MOTION.

Hargett Z, Gutierrez M, Harman M Proc ASME Verification Valid Symp 2019 (2019). 2021; 5(3).

PMID: 33575687 PMC: 7875196. DOI: 10.1115/1.4048748.


A constrained-condylar fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty is stabilised by the medial soft tissues.

Athwal K, Willinger L, Manning W, Deehan D, Amis A Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020; 29(2):659-667.

PMID: 32322947 PMC: 7892729. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-05995-6.


The role of rotating hinge implants in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Pasquier G, Ehlinger M, Mainard D EFORT Open Rev. 2019; 4(6):269-278.

PMID: 31210968 PMC: 6549216. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180070.