» Articles » PMID: 27025870

[Total Knee Arthroplasty. Patient-specific Instruments and Implants]

Overview
Journal Orthopade
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2016 Mar 31
PMID 27025870
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This article describes the concept and surgical technique of patient-specific total knee arthroplasty. Patient-specific implants and instruments are designed and fabricated based on computed tomography (CT) data of the leg. The disposable patient-specific drill guides and cutting-jigs are manufactured taking into consideration the anatomical and biomechanical axes of the knee joint and mediating the efficient pre-navigation of the osseous saw-cuts, without the need for additional navigation or balancing aids. The surgical plan is made on the basis of the CT data. The implantation technique comprises the following steps: distal femoral resection, tibial resection, balancing and femur preparation, tibia preparation, optional patellar resurfacing, trialling of the test components, and implantation of the final components. By using this patient-specific implant system, which includes not only personalized, single-use instruments, but also individualized implants, the surgeon is able to provide endoprosthetic treatment that broadly restores the patient's own knee anatomy and knee kinematics. Preliminary studies have proven the concept and data on this technology are promising so far; however, like a new implant, they are usually limited. In particular, comparative long-term clinical data are still to come.

Citing Articles

Patient specific implants versus conventional implants in primary total knee arthroplasty: No significant difference in patient reported outcomes at 5 years.

Pelkowski J, Young P, OConnor M, Sherman C, McElroy M, Ledford C J Orthop. 2023; 46:124-127.

PMID: 37994363 PMC: 10659996. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.10.034.


Application of metal artifact reduction software in gemstone spectral computed tomography for patients after total knee arthroplasty.

Zhang J, Wang X, Zhao F, Zhang K, Li Y, Zhang Y Ann Transl Med. 2022; 10(16):864.

PMID: 36111031 PMC: 9469117. DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-3286.


The Impact of Total Knee Replacement with a Customized Cruciate-Retaining Implant Design on Patient-Reported and Functional Outcomes.

Steinert A, Schroder L, Sefrin L, Janssen B, Arnholdt J, Rudert M J Pers Med. 2022; 12(2).

PMID: 35207682 PMC: 8880382. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12020194.


Patient-specific cruciate-retaining total knee replacement with individualized implants and instruments (iTotal™ CR G2).

Steinert A, Sefrin L, Jansen B, Schroder L, Holzapfel B, Arnholdt J Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2020; 33(2):170-180.

PMID: 33289871 DOI: 10.1007/s00064-020-00690-8.


Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) 3D printing Special Interest Group (SIG): guidelines for medical 3D printing and appropriateness for clinical scenarios.

Chepelev L, Wake N, Ryan J, Althobaity W, Gupta A, Arribas E 3D Print Med. 2019; 4(1):11.

PMID: 30649688 PMC: 6251945. DOI: 10.1186/s41205-018-0030-y.


References
1.
Schwarzkopf R, Brodsky M, A Garcia G, Gomoll A . Surgical and Functional Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Replacement With Patient-Specific Implants Compared With "Off-the-Shelf" Implants. Orthop J Sports Med. 2015; 3(7):2325967115590379. PMC: 4622326. DOI: 10.1177/2325967115590379. View

2.
Athwal K, Hunt N, Davies A, Deehan D, Amis A . Clinical biomechanics of instability related to total knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2013; 29(2):119-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.11.004. View

3.
Siqueira M, Klika A, Higuera C, Barsoum W . Modes of failure of total knee arthroplasty: registries and realities. J Knee Surg. 2014; 28(2):127-38. DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1396014. View

4.
Fitzpatrick C, Clary C, Rullkoetter P . The role of patient, surgical, and implant design variation in total knee replacement performance. J Biomech. 2012; 45(12):2092-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.05.035. View

5.
Jiang J, Kang X, Lin Q, Teng Y, An L, Ma J . Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation compared with conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2015; 38(4):e305-13. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20150402-59. View