» Articles » PMID: 29181558

Internal-external Malalignment of the Femoral Component in Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty Increases Tibial Force Imbalance but Does Not Change Laxities of the Tibiofemoral Joint

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2017 Nov 29
PMID 29181558
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purposes of this study were to quantify the increase in tibial force imbalance (i.e. magnitude of difference between medial and lateral tibial forces) and changes in laxities caused by  2° and 4° of internal-external (I-E) malalignment of the femoral component in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Because I-E malalignment would introduce the greatest changes to the articular surfaces near 90° of flexion, the hypotheses were that the tibial force imbalance would be significantly increased near 90° flexion and that primarily varus-valgus laxity would be affected near 90° flexion.

Methods: Kinematically aligned TKA was performed on ten human cadaveric knee specimens using disposable manual instruments without soft tissue release. One 3D-printed reference femoral component, with unmodified geometry, was aligned to restore the native distal and posterior femoral joint lines. Four 3D-printed femoral components, with modified geometry, introduced I-E malalignments of 2° and 4° from the reference component. Medial and lateral tibial forces were measured from 0° to 120° flexion using a custom tibial force sensor. Bidirectional laxities in four degrees of freedom were measured from 0° to 120° flexion using a custom load application system.

Results: Tibial force imbalance increased the greatest at 60° flexion where a regression analysis against the degree of I-E malalignment yielded sensitivities (i.e. slopes) of 30 N/° (medial tibial force > lateral tibial force) and 10 N/° (lateral tibial force > medial tibial force) for internal and external malalignments, respectively. Valgus laxity increased significantly with the 4° external component with the greatest increase of 1.5° occurring at 90° flexion (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: With the tibial component correctly aligned, I-E malalignment of the femoral component caused significant increases in tibial force imbalance. Minimizing I-E malalignment lowers the increase in the tibial force imbalance. By keeping the resection thickness of each posterior femoral condyle to within ± 0.5 mm of the thickness of the respective posterior region of the femoral component, the increase in imbalance can be effectively limited to 38 N. Generally laxities were unaffected within the ± 4º range tested indicating that instability is not a clinical concern and that manual testing of laxities is not useful to detect I-E malalignment.

Citing Articles

Anatomical Reference of the Femur after Distal Resection Is Reliable for Rotational Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Kim S, Park Y, Choi G, Lee H J Pers Med. 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38929884 PMC: 11204464. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14060663.


Six Commonly Used Postoperative Radiographic Alignment Parameters Do Not Predict Clinical Outcome Scores after Unrestricted Caliper-Verified Kinematically Aligned TKA.

Dhaliwal A, Zamora T, Nedopil A, Howell S, Hull M J Pers Med. 2022; 12(9).

PMID: 36143253 PMC: 9503412. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12091468.


A Surgeon That Switched to Unrestricted Kinematic Alignment with Manual Instruments Has a Short Learning Curve and Comparable Resection Accuracy and Outcomes to Those of an Experienced Surgeon.

Nedopil A, Dhaliwal A, Howell S, Hull M J Pers Med. 2022; 12(7).

PMID: 35887649 PMC: 9320158. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12071152.


Excellent and Good Results Treating Stiffness with Early and Late Manipulation after Unrestricted Caliper-Verified Kinematically Aligned TKA.

Shekhar A, Howell S, Nedopil A, Hull M J Pers Med. 2022; 12(2).

PMID: 35207792 PMC: 8875955. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12020304.


Restoring the Patient's Pre-Arthritic Posterior Slope Is the Correct Target for Maximizing Internal Tibial Rotation When Implanting a PCL Retaining TKA with Calipered Kinematic Alignment.

Nedopil A, Delman C, Howell S, Hull M J Pers Med. 2021; 11(6).

PMID: 34200031 PMC: 8228254. DOI: 10.3390/jpm11060516.


References
1.
Athwal K, Hunt N, Davies A, Deehan D, Amis A . Clinical biomechanics of instability related to total knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2013; 29(2):119-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.11.004. View

2.
Meneghini R, Ziemba-Davis M, Lovro L, Ireland P, Damer B . Can Intraoperative Sensors Determine the "Target" Ligament Balance? Early Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016; 31(10):2181-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.046. View

3.
Howell S, Papadopoulos S, Kuznik K, Hull M . Accurate alignment and high function after kinematically aligned TKA performed with generic instruments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013; 21(10):2271-80. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2621-x. View

4.
Dalury D, Pomeroy D, Gorab R, Adams M . Why are total knee arthroplasties being revised?. J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28(8 Suppl):120-1. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.051. View

5.
Liau J, Cheng C, Huang C, Lo W . The effect of malalignment on stresses in polyethylene component of total knee prostheses--a finite element analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2002; 17(2):140-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(01)00109-7. View