» Articles » PMID: 24308530

Comparative Short-term in Vitro Analysis of Mutans Streptococci Adhesion on Esthetic, Nickel-titanium, and Stainless-steel Arch Wires

Overview
Journal Angle Orthod
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2013 Dec 7
PMID 24308530
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To test the hypothesis that there are no differences in mutans streptococci (MS) adhesion between esthetic and metallic orthodontic arch wires based on their surface characteristics.

Materials And Methods: Surface roughness (Ra) and apparent surface free energy (SFE) were measured for six wires-four esthetic, one nickel-titanium (NiTi), and one stainless-steel (SS)-using profilometry and dynamic contact angle analysis, respectively. The amount of MS (Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus) adhering to the wires was quantified using the colony-counting method. The surfaces, coating layers, and MS adhesion were also observed by scanning electron microscopy. Statistical significance was set at P < .05.

Results: The Ra values of the esthetic wires were significantly different from one another depending on the coating method (P < .05). The NiTi wire showed the highest SFE, followed by the SS wire and then the four esthetic wires. The NiTi wires produced a significantly higher MS adhesion than did the SS wires (P < .05). The esthetic wires showed significantly lower MS adhesions than did the NiTi wire (P < .05). Pearson correlation analyses found moderate significant positive correlations between the SFE and the S mutans and S sobrinus adhesions (r  =  .636/.427, P < .001/P  =  .001, respectively).

Conclusions: The hypothesis is rejected. This study indicates that some esthetic coatings on NiTi alloy might reduce MS adhesion in vitro in the short term.

Citing Articles

Molecular Docking and Experimental Analysis of Essential Oil-Based Preparations on Biofilm Formation on Orthodontic Archwires.

Alexa V, Fratila A, Oancea R, Galuscan A, Balean O, Bolchis V Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 25(24.

PMID: 39769141 PMC: 11678866. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252413378.


Microbial adhesion on different types of orthodontic brackets and wires: An in vitro study.

Abutayyem H, Abdullatif Alshehhi M, Alameri M, Zafar M Saudi Dent J. 2024; 36(11):1459-1465.

PMID: 39619715 PMC: 11605721. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.09.004.


Evaluation of torsional strength and torque presentation of coated rectangular stainless steel archwires, an in vitro study.

Salehi P, Ajami S, Berahman N, Azadeh N J Orofac Orthop. 2023; 85(Suppl 2):137-144.

PMID: 37910176 DOI: 10.1007/s00056-023-00503-0.


Functional Surface Coatings on Orthodontic Appliances: Reviews of Friction Reduction, Antibacterial Properties, and Corrosion Resistance.

Zhang R, Han B, Liu X Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(8).

PMID: 37108082 PMC: 10138808. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24086919.


Evaluation of biofilm formation on different clear orthodontic retainer materials.

Hamdoon S, AlSamak S, Ahmed M, Gasgoos S J Orthod Sci. 2022; 11:34.

PMID: 36188210 PMC: 9515562. DOI: 10.4103/jos.jos_7_22.


References
1.
Mei L, Busscher H, van der Mei H, Ren Y . Influence of surface roughness on streptococcal adhesion forces to composite resins. Dent Mater. 2011; 27(8):770-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.03.017. View

2.
DAnto V, Rongo R, Ametrano G, Spagnuolo G, Manzo P, Martina R . Evaluation of surface roughness of orthodontic wires by means of atomic force microscopy. Angle Orthod. 2012; 82(5):922-8. PMC: 8823114. DOI: 10.2319/100211-620.1. View

3.
Lee H, Park H, Kim K, Kwon T, Hong S . Effect of garlic on bacterial biofilm formation on orthodontic wire. Angle Orthod. 2011; 81(5):895-900. PMC: 8916176. DOI: 10.2319/121010-713.1. View

4.
Zhou Z, Fan S . Letter to the editor: new equations for predicting postoperative risk in patients with hip fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(4):1181-2. PMC: 2835606. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1248-1. View

5.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A, Buchner A . G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39(2):175-91. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193146. View