» Articles » PMID: 22167431

Wetting Behavior of Dental Implants

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2011 Dec 15
PMID 22167431
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Hydrophilicity is gaining increasing interest as a factor that might influence the osseointegration of dental implants. Therefore, in this study the dynamic wetting behavior of currently marketed dental titanium implants was analyzed by tensiometry, and its relationship to surface topography was examined.

Materials And Methods: Nine screw-type implant systems from eight manufacturers were evaluated. Dynamic water contact angles were analyzed by tensiometric multiloop Wilhelmy experiments (10 loops, 10 mm/min immersion speed). The wetted length (perimeter) of the immersed samples was estimated by three-dimensional picture profile measurement of the thread height of the respective implant screws. Wettability was quantified by first advancing contact angles. Additionally, static contact angles were determined using the sessile drop technique. All implant surfaces were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Contact angle data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance followed by the Student t test.

Results: SEM revealed different types of surface morphology resulting from the different manufacturing processes. The first advancing mean contact angles of all implants ranged from 0 degrees (SLActive) to 138 degrees (OsseoSpeed), demonstrating statistically significant differences between implants. Because of kinetic hysteresis, initially hydrophobic implants became hydrophilic during following immersion loops.

Conclusions: The tensiometric method was used to compare wettability of dental implants. A range from fully wettable/superhydrophilic to virtually unwettable/hydrophobic was observed on the implant surfaces examined.

Citing Articles

The Effect of NiTi Brush, Polishing Brush, and Chemical Agent on the Dental Implant Surface Morphology and Cytocompatibility.

Brunello G, Becker K, Rauch N, Schwarz F, Becker J Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024; 27(1):e13417.

PMID: 39569703 PMC: 11798888. DOI: 10.1111/cid.13417.


Osteoblast Response to Widely Ranged Texturing Conditions Obtained through High Power Laser Beams on Ti Surfaces.

Ruffinatti F, Genova T, Roato I, Perin M, Chinigo G, Pedraza R J Funct Biomater. 2024; 15(10).

PMID: 39452601 PMC: 11508658. DOI: 10.3390/jfb15100303.


Bovine Mineral Grafting Affects the Hydrophilicity of Dental Implant Surfaces: An In Vitro Study.

Newman A, Anderson N, Romanos G Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(16).

PMID: 39203230 PMC: 11356546. DOI: 10.3390/ma17164052.


Surface Topography Has Less Influence on Peri-Implantitis than Patient Factors: A Comparative Clinical Study of Two Dental Implant Systems.

Hussain B, Grytten J, Rongen G, Sanz M, Haugen H ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2024; 10(7):4562-4574.

PMID: 38916970 PMC: 11234333. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01809.


Biocompatible Nanostructured Silver-Incorporated Implant Surfaces Show Effective Antibacterial, Osteogenic, and Anti-Inflammatory Effects in vitro and in Rat Model.

Gao H, Jiang N, Niu Q, Mei S, Haugen H, Ma Q Int J Nanomedicine. 2023; 18:7359-7378.

PMID: 38090361 PMC: 10711298. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S435415.