» Articles » PMID: 18768217

Streptococcal Adhesion to Novel Low-shrink Silorane-based Restorative

Overview
Journal Dent Mater
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2008 Sep 5
PMID 18768217
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to compare the susceptibility of one novel silorane-based and four widely used conventional methacrylate-based resin composites to adhere oral streptococci and to relate any differences to surface roughness, hydrophobicity and type of matrix.

Methods: Specimens of restoratives Filtek Silorane, Filtek Z250, Tetric EvoCeram, Quixfil and Spectrum TPH were prepared (10.0-mm diameter, 2.0-mm height). Surface roughness was assessed by perthometer measurements and hydrophobicity according to water contact angles was determined by computerized image analysis. Bacterial suspensions of Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus sanguinis, Streptococcus gordonii and Streptococcus mutans were incubated for 2.5 h at 37 degrees C with 15 test specimens for each material and adhesion was quantified with fluorescence dye Alamar Blue/Resazurin and an automated multi-detection reader. Glass served as reference. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test (alpha=0.05).

Results: Median roughness values of all composites ranged between 0.04 and 0.11 microm, median contact angles between 59.7 degrees and 92.1 degrees. Significantly lowest fluorescence intensities of all test materials were found on Filtek Silorane for three of four streptococcal strains. The fluorescence intensities of the four conventional methacrylate resin composites were significantly higher and comparable among each other.

Significance: When compared against four conventional methacrylate composite resins, a general significance to a lower quantity of adhering streptococci was found on the novel silorane-based composite resin, which might result from its increased hydrophobicity. The low adhesion potential of the silorane-based composite may potentially improve the longevity of direct fillings and reduce recurrent caries.

Citing Articles

Biofilm Formation on Three High-Performance Polymeric CAD/CAM Composites: An In Vitro Study.

Almuhayya S, Alshahrani R, Alsania R, Albassam A, Alnemari H, Babaier R Polymers (Basel). 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40076168 PMC: 11902371. DOI: 10.3390/polym17050676.


Biofilm Formation on Hybrid, Resin-Based CAD/CAM Materials for Indirect Restorations: A Comprehensive Review.

Tzimas K, Rahiotis C, Pappa E Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(7).

PMID: 38611989 PMC: 11012497. DOI: 10.3390/ma17071474.


Novel Dental Restorative Solutions for Natural Teeth and Implants.

Paolone G, Mandurino M, Pavan F, Mazzitelli C, Cantatore G Bioengineering (Basel). 2022; 9(12).

PMID: 36550979 PMC: 9774112. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9120772.


Siloranes-Suitability of a Novel Adhesive for Orthodontic Bracket Bonding.

Brauchli L, Steineck M Dent J (Basel). 2021; 9(11).

PMID: 34821599 PMC: 8625760. DOI: 10.3390/dj9110135.


The Influence of Modified Experimental Dental Resin Composites on the Initial In Situ Biofilm-A Triple-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Split-Mouth Trial.

Burgard N, Kienitz M, Jourdan C, Ruttermann S Polymers (Basel). 2021; 13(16).

PMID: 34451352 PMC: 8400102. DOI: 10.3390/polym13162814.