» Articles » PMID: 24293150

Transcriptome Characterization and Sequencing-based Identification of Drought-responsive Genes in Potato

Overview
Journal Mol Biol Rep
Specialty Molecular Biology
Date 2013 Dec 3
PMID 24293150
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Potato (Solanum tubersosum L.) is relatively vulnerable to abiotic stress conditions such as drought, but the tolerance mechanisms to such stress in potato are largely unknown. To gain insight into the transcriptome dynamics that are associated with drought stress, genome-wide gene expression profile was conducted by Solexa sequencing to generate a large dataset and a comprehensive transcriptome profile for potato. Here, we report a reference for the potato transcriptome using leaf tissues under drought-stressed condition from a local potato cultivar 'Longshu 3'. Analysis of 86,965,482 RNA-Seq reads permitted the detection and quantification of expression levels of 7,284 genes at transcriptional levels, among them, 6,754 genes were enriched in draught-treated leaves while 6,419 in control. We identified 842 drought-responsive up-regulated and 494 down-regulated candidate genes with significantly differentially expression under continued drought stress treatments. Those differently expressed genes were mostly enriched in 89 gene categories and 21 KEGG pathways. Drought-stressed leaves had increased expression of genes involved in stress response compared with control leaves. A subset of differentially expressed genes associated with drought response was examined using quantitative real-time PCR. These results provide a broad spectrum of candidate genes that are essential for understanding the molecular regulation of potato in response to abiotic stresses.

Citing Articles

Overexpression of in Potato Enhances Tolerance to Drought Stress.

Bi Z, Dekomah S, Wang Y, Pu Z, Wang X, Dormatey R Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(23).

PMID: 39684333 PMC: 11640904. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252312620.


Gene Expression Analysis for Drought Tolerance in Early Stage of Potato Plant Development.

Kanat R, Shamekova M, Sapakhova Z, Toishimanov M, Daurov D, Raissova N Biology (Basel). 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 39596812 PMC: 11591961. DOI: 10.3390/biology13110857.


Creating a zero amylose barley with high soluble sugar content by genome editing.

Li Y, Jiang Y, Cao D, Dang B, Yang X, Fan S Plant Mol Biol. 2024; 114(3):50.

PMID: 38656412 DOI: 10.1007/s11103-024-01445-w.


A comprehensive and conceptual overview of omics-based approaches for enhancing the resilience of vegetable crops against abiotic stresses.

Mangal V, Lal M, Tiwari R, Altaf M, Sood S, Gahlaut V Planta. 2023; 257(4):80.

PMID: 36913037 DOI: 10.1007/s00425-023-04111-5.


Transcriptome Analysis of Two Tetraploid Potato Varieties under Water-Stress Conditions.

Alvarez-Morezuelas A, Barandalla L, Ritter E, Ruiz de Galarreta J Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(22).

PMID: 36430379 PMC: 9694765. DOI: 10.3390/ijms232213905.


References
1.
Ye J, Fang L, Zheng H, Zhang Y, Chen J, Zhang Z . WEGO: a web tool for plotting GO annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34(Web Server issue):W293-7. PMC: 1538768. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkl031. View

2.
Flinn B, Rothwell C, Griffiths R, Lague M, DeKoeyer D, Sardana R . Potato expressed sequence tag generation and analysis using standard and unique cDNA libraries. Plant Mol Biol. 2005; 59(3):407-33. DOI: 10.1007/s11103-005-0185-y. View

3.
Evers D, Legay S, Lamoureux D, Hausman J, Hoffmann L, Renaut J . Towards a synthetic view of potato cold and salt stress response by transcriptomic and proteomic analyses. Plant Mol Biol. 2012; 78(4-5):503-14. DOI: 10.1007/s11103-012-9879-0. View

4.
Thimm O, Blasing O, Gibon Y, Nagel A, Meyer S, Kruger P . MAPMAN: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant J. 2004; 37(6):914-39. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02016.x. View

5.
Nicot N, Hausman J, Hoffmann L, Evers D . Housekeeping gene selection for real-time RT-PCR normalization in potato during biotic and abiotic stress. J Exp Bot. 2005; 56(421):2907-14. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eri285. View