» Articles » PMID: 24288418

An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Recruitment Patterns on RDS Estimates Among a Socially Ordered Population of Female Sex Workers in China

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2013 Nov 30
PMID 24288418
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a method for recruiting "hidden" populations through a network-based, chain and peer referral process. RDS recruits hidden populations more effectively than other sampling methods and promises to generate unbiased estimates of their characteristics. RDS's faithful representation of hidden populations relies on the validity of core assumptions regarding the unobserved referral process. With empirical recruitment data from an RDS study of female sex workers (FSWs) in Shanghai, we assess the RDS assumption that participants recruit nonpreferentially from among their network alters. We also present a bootstrap method for constructing the confidence intervals around RDS estimates. This approach uniquely incorporates real-world features of the population under study (e.g., the sample's observed branching structure). We then extend this approach to approximate the distribution of RDS estimates under various peer recruitment scenarios consistent with the data as a means to quantify the impact of recruitment bias and of rejection bias on the RDS estimates. We find that the hierarchical social organization of FSWs leads to recruitment biases by constraining RDS recruitment across social classes and introducing bias in the RDS estimates.

Citing Articles

The Development and the Assessment of Sampling Methods for Hard-to-Reach Populations in HIV Surveillance.

Wang P, Wei C, McFarland W, Raymond H J Urban Health. 2024; 101(4):856-866.

PMID: 38787451 PMC: 11329483. DOI: 10.1007/s11524-024-00880-w.


Using Social Networks to Sample Migrants and Study the Complexity of Contemporary Immigration: An Evaluation Study.

Merli M, Mouw T, Le Barbenchon C, Stolte A Demography. 2022; 59(3):995-1022.

PMID: 35466383 PMC: 9177666. DOI: 10.1215/00703370-9934929.


Using Social Networks to Understand and Overcome Implementation Barriers in the Global HIV Response.

Harling G, Tsai A J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019; 82 Suppl 3:S244-S252.

PMID: 31764260 PMC: 6923140. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002203.


Implementing Respondent-Driven Sampling to Recruit Women Who Exchange Sex in New York City: Factors Associated with Recruitment and Lessons Learned.

Carrillo S, Rivera A, Braunstein S AIDS Behav. 2019; 24(2):580-591.

PMID: 30929151 PMC: 8201473. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-019-02485-w.


Empirical evidence of recruitment bias in a network study of people who inject drugs.

Zeng L, Li J, Crawford F Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2019; 45(5):460-469.

PMID: 30896982 PMC: 7680667. DOI: 10.1080/00952990.2019.1584203.


References
1.
Robinson W, Risser J, McGoy S, Becker A, Rehman H, Jefferson M . Recruiting injection drug users: a three-site comparison of results and experiences with respondent-driven and targeted sampling procedures. J Urban Health. 2006; 83(6 Suppl):i29-38. PMC: 1705501. DOI: 10.1007/s11524-006-9100-3. View

2.
Munoz F, Pollini R, Zuniga M, Strathdee S, Lozada R, Martinez G . Condom access: Associations with consistent condom use among female sex workers in two northern border cities of Mexico. AIDS Educ Prev. 2010; 22(5):455-65. PMC: 3069917. DOI: 10.1521/aeap.2010.22.5.455. View

3.
Johnston L, Khanam R, Reza M, Khan S, Banu S, Alam M . The effectiveness of respondent driven sampling for recruiting males who have sex with males in Dhaka, Bangladesh. AIDS Behav. 2007; 12(2):294-304. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-007-9300-1. View

4.
Dandona R, Dandona L, Gutierrez J, Kumar A, McPherson S, Samuels F . High risk of HIV in non-brothel based female sex workers in India. BMC Public Health. 2005; 5:87. PMC: 1208909. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-87. View

5.
Salganik M . Variance estimation, design effects, and sample size calculations for respondent-driven sampling. J Urban Health. 2006; 83(6 Suppl):i98-112. PMC: 1705515. DOI: 10.1007/s11524-006-9106-x. View