» Articles » PMID: 20161130

AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING: POINT ESTIMATES, VARIANCE, DEGREE MEASURES, AND OUT-OF-EQUILIBRIUM DATA

Overview
Journal Sociol Methodol
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2010 Feb 18
PMID 20161130
Citations 79
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper, which is the first large scale application of Respondent-Driven Sampling (RDS) to non-hidden populations, tests three factors related to RDS estimation against institutional data using two WebRDS samples of university undergraduates. First, two methods of calculating RDS point estimates are compared. RDS estimates calculated using both methods coincide closely, but variance estimation, especially for small groups, is problematic for both methods. In one method, the bootstrap algorithm used to generate confidence intervals is found to underestimate variance. In the other method, where analytical variance estimation is possible, confidence intervals tend to overestimate variance. Second, RDS estimates are found to be robust against varying measures of individual degree. Results suggest the standard degree measure currently employed in most RDS studies is among the best performing degree measures. Finally, RDS is found to be robust against the inclusion of out-of-equilibrium data. The results show that valid point estimates can be generated with RDS analysis using real data, however further research is needed to improve variance estimation techniques.

Citing Articles

Predictors of consistent condom use among young psychoactive substance users in Kampala's informal settlements, Uganda.

Ssekamatte T, Mugambe R, Nalugya A, Isunju J, Matovu J, Kansiime W Dialogues Health. 2024; 1:100080.

PMID: 38515898 PMC: 10953897. DOI: 10.1016/j.dialog.2022.100080.


Employing Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS) to recruit people who inject drugs (PWID) and other hard-to-reach populations during COVID-19: Lessons learned.

Abadie R, Habecker P, Carrasco K, Chiou K, Fernando S, Bennett S Front Psychiatry. 2022; 13:990055.

PMID: 36262631 PMC: 9574048. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.990055.


Using Social Networks to Sample Migrants and Study the Complexity of Contemporary Immigration: An Evaluation Study.

Merli M, Mouw T, Le Barbenchon C, Stolte A Demography. 2022; 59(3):995-1022.

PMID: 35466383 PMC: 9177666. DOI: 10.1215/00703370-9934929.


On The Robustness Of Respondent-Driven Sampling Estimators To Measurement Error.

Fellows I J Surv Stat Methodol. 2022; 10(2):377-396.

PMID: 35449603 PMC: 9014508. DOI: 10.1093/jssam/smab056.


Network centrality for the identification of biomarkers in respondent-driven sampling datasets.

Grubb J, Lopez D, Mohan B, Matta J PLoS One. 2021; 16(8):e0256601.

PMID: 34428228 PMC: 8384166. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256601.


References
1.
Watts D, Strogatz S . Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature. 1998; 393(6684):440-2. DOI: 10.1038/30918. View

2.
Malekinejad M, Johnston L, Kendall C, Kerr L, Rifkin M, Rutherford G . Using respondent-driven sampling methodology for HIV biological and behavioral surveillance in international settings: a systematic review. AIDS Behav. 2008; 12(4 Suppl):S105-30. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-008-9421-1. View

3.
Wang J, Carlson R, Falck R, Siegal H, Rahman A, Li L . Respondent-driven sampling to recruit MDMA users: a methodological assessment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005; 78(2):147-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.10.011. View

4.
Salganik M . Variance estimation, design effects, and sample size calculations for respondent-driven sampling. J Urban Health. 2006; 83(6 Suppl):i98-112. PMC: 1705515. DOI: 10.1007/s11524-006-9106-x. View

5.
Bell D, Belli-McQueen B, Haider A . Partner Naming and Forgetting: Recall of Network Members. Soc Networks. 2007; 29(2):279-299. PMC: 2031835. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2006.12.004. View