Generalizing the Network Scale-Up Method: A New Estimator for the Size of Hidden Populations

Overview

Journal Sociol Methodol

Specialty Social Sciences

Date 2018 Jan 30

PMID 29375167

Citations 26

Authors

Dennis M Feehan

Matthew J Salganik

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The network scale-up method enables researchers to estimate the size of hidden populations, such as drug injectors and sex workers, using sampled social network data. The basic scale-up estimator offers advantages over other size estimation techniques, but it depends on problematic modeling assumptions. We propose a new generalized scale-up estimator that can be used in settings with non-random social mixing and imperfect awareness about membership in the hidden population. Further, the new estimator can be used when data are collected via complex sample designs and from incomplete sampling frames. However, the generalized scale-up estimator also requires data from two samples: one from the frame population and one from the hidden population. In some situations these data from the hidden population can be collected by adding a small number of questions to already planned studies. For other situations, we develop interpretable adjustment factors that can be applied to the basic scale-up estimator. We conclude with practical recommendations for the design and analysis of future studies.

Citing Articles

Estimating the Social Visibility of Abortions in Uganda and Ethiopia Using the Game of Contacts.

Giorgio M, Shiferaw S, Makumbi F, Seme A, Kibira S, Nabukeera S Stud Fam Plann. 2024; 55(4):291-314.

PMID: 39533531 PMC: 11636778. DOI: 10.1111/sifp.12278.

Comparing the Robustness of Simple Network Scale-Up Method Estimators.

Kunke J, Laga I, Niu X, McCormick T Sociol Methodol. 2024; 54(2):385-403.

PMID: 39391075 PMC: 11466224. DOI: 10.1177/00811750241242791.

Invited commentary: motivating better methods-and better data collection-for measuring the prevalence of drug misuse.

Kiang M, Alexander M Am J Epidemiol. 2024; 194(1):12-16.

PMID: 38932578 PMC: 11735954. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwae156.

Direct and indirect estimation of adolescent sexual intercourse and contraceptive use in Rajasthan India: an application of the best friend methodology.

Bell S, Ahmad D, Khanna A, Thomas H, Moreau C BMC Womens Health. 2024; 24(1):373.

PMID: 38926696 PMC: 11210037. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03209-6.

Thirty Years of The Network Scale-up Method.

Laga I, Bao L, Niu X J Am Stat Assoc. 2023; 116(535):1548-1559.

PMID: 37994314 PMC: 10665021. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2021.1935267.

References

Gile K, Handcock M . Respondent-Driven Sampling: An Assessment of Current Methodology. Sociol Methodol. 2012; 40(1):285-327. PMC: 3437336. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9531.2010.01223.x. View

Gilovich T, Savitsky K, Medvec V . The illusion of transparency: biased assessments of others' ability to read one's emotional states. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998; 75(2):332-46. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.2.332. View

McCormick T, Salganik M, Zheng T . How many people do you know?: Efficiently estimating personal network size. J Am Stat Assoc. 2013; 105(489):59-70. PMC: 3666355. DOI: 10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08518. View

Salganik M . Variance estimation, design effects, and sample size calculations for respondent-driven sampling. J Urban Health. 2006; 83(6 Suppl):i98-112. PMC: 1705515. DOI: 10.1007/s11524-006-9106-x. View

Ezoe S, Morooka T, Noda T, Sabin M, Koike S . Population size estimation of men who have sex with men through the network scale-up method in Japan. PLoS One. 2012; 7(1):e31184. PMC: 3341925. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031184. View

Snidero S, Soriani N, Baldi I, Zobec F, Berchialla P, Gregori D . Scale-up approach in CATI surveys for estimating the number of foreign body injuries in the aero-digestive tract in children. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012; 9(11):4056-67. PMC: 3524612. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph9114056. View

Handcock M, Gile K, Mar C . Estimating the size of populations at high risk for HIV using respondent-driven sampling data. Biometrics. 2015; 71(1):258-266. PMC: 4418439. DOI: 10.1111/biom.12255. View

Salganik M, Mello M, Abdo A, Bertoni N, Fazito D, Bastos F . The Game of Contacts: Estimating the Social Visibility of Groups. Soc Networks. 2011; 33(1):70-78. PMC: 3035387. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2010.10.006. View

Heimer R . Critical issues and further questions about respondent-driven sampling: comment on Ramirez-Valles, et al. (2005). AIDS Behav. 2005; 9(4):403-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-005-9030-1. View

10.

Maghsoudi A, Baneshi M, Neydavoodi M, Haghdoost A . Network scale-up correction factors for population size estimation of people who inject drugs and female sex workers in Iran. PLoS One. 2014; 9(11):e110917. PMC: 4218714. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110917. View

11.

Bernard H, Hallett T, Iovita A, Johnsen E, Lyerla R, McCarty C . Counting hard-to-count populations: the network scale-up method for public health. Sex Transm Infect. 2010; 86 Suppl 2:ii11-5. PMC: 3010902. DOI: 10.1136/sti.2010.044446. View

12.

Johnston L, McLaughlin K, El Rhilani H, Latifi A, Toufik A, Bennani A . Estimating the Size of Hidden Populations Using Respondent-driven Sampling Data: Case Examples from Morocco. Epidemiology. 2015; 26(6):846-52. PMC: 4586393. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000362. View

13.

Berchenko Y, Rosenblatt J, Frost S . Modeling and analyzing respondent-driven sampling as a counting process. Biometrics. 2017; 73(4):1189-1198. DOI: 10.1111/biom.12678. View

14.

Verdery A, Mouw T, Bauldry S, Mucha P . Network Structure and Biased Variance Estimation in Respondent Driven Sampling. PLoS One. 2015; 10(12):e0145296. PMC: 4682989. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145296. View

15.

Shokoohi M, Baneshi M, Haghdoost A . Size Estimation of Groups at High Risk of HIV/AIDS using Network Scale Up in Kerman, Iran. Int J Prev Med. 2012; 3(7):471-6. PMC: 3415187. View

16.

Scott G . "They got their program, and I got mine": a cautionary tale concerning the ethical implications of using respondent-driven sampling to study injection drug users. Int J Drug Policy. 2008; 19(1):42-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.11.014. View

17.

Yamanis T, Merli M, Neely W, Tian F, Moody J, Tu X . An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Recruitment Patterns on RDS Estimates among a Socially Ordered Population of Female Sex Workers in China. Sociol Methods Res. 2013; 42(3). PMC: 3840895. DOI: 10.1177/0049124113494576. View

18.

Mouw T, Verdery A . Network Sampling with Memory: A proposal for more efficient sampling from social networks. Sociol Methodol. 2013; 42(1):206-256. PMC: 3805142. DOI: 10.1177/0081175012461248. View

19.

Goel S, Salganik M . Assessing respondent-driven sampling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(15):6743-7. PMC: 2872407. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1000261107. View

20.

McCreesh N, Frost S, Seeley J, Katongole J, Tarsh M, Ndunguse R . Evaluation of respondent-driven sampling. Epidemiology. 2011; 23(1):138-47. PMC: 3277908. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31823ac17c. View