» Articles » PMID: 24225357

Biomarker Responses to Folic Acid Intervention in Healthy Adults: a Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview
Journal Am J Clin Nutr
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2013 Nov 15
PMID 24225357
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The task of revising dietary folate recommendations for optimal health is complicated by a lack of data quantifying the biomarker response that reliably reflects a given folate intake.

Objective: We conducted a dose-response meta-analysis in healthy adults to quantify the typical response of recognized folate biomarkers to a change in folic acid intake.

Design: Electronic and bibliographic searches identified 19 randomized controlled trials that supplemented with folic acid and measured folate biomarkers before and after the intervention in apparently healthy adults aged ≥18 y. For each biomarker response, the regression coefficient (β) for individual studies and the overall pooled β were calculated by using random-effects meta-analysis.

Results: Folate biomarkers (serum/plasma and red blood cell folate) increased in response to folic acid in a dose-response manner only up to an intake of 400 μg/d. Calculation of the overall pooled β for studies in the range of 50 to 400 μg/d indicated that a doubling of folic acid intake resulted in an increase in serum/plasma folate by 63% (71% for microbiological assay; 61% for nonmicrobiological assay) and red blood cell folate by 31% (irrespective of whether microbiological or other assay was used). Studies that used the microbiological assay indicated lower heterogeneity compared with studies using nonmicrobiological assays for determining serum/plasma (I(2) = 13.5% compared with I(2) = 77.2%) and red blood cell (I(2) = 45.9% compared with I(2) = 70.2%) folate.

Conclusions: Studies administering >400 μg folic acid/d show no dose-response relation and thus will not yield meaningful results for consideration when generating dietary folate recommendations. The calculated folate biomarker response to a given folic acid intake may be more robust with the use of a microbiological assay rather than alternative methods for blood folate measurement.

Citing Articles

Unraveling Gender Differences in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Focus on Key Micronutrients.

Algin S, Sajib M, Ahmed S, Siddique M, Reza M, Tanzilla N Cureus. 2025; 17(2):e79667.

PMID: 40017580 PMC: 11865865. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.79667.


The intake of ultra-processed foods and homocysteine levels in women with(out) overweight and obesity: The Rotterdam Periconceptional Cohort.

Schenkelaars N, van Rossem L, Willemsen S, Faas M, Schoenmakers S, Steegers-Theunissen R Eur J Nutr. 2024; 63(4):1257-1269.

PMID: 38383813 PMC: 11139698. DOI: 10.1007/s00394-024-03334-w.


Global strategies for the prevention of neural tube defects through the improvement of folate status in women of reproductive age.

Martinez H, Benavides-Lara A, Arynchyna-Smith A, Ghotme K, Arabi M, Arynchyn A Childs Nerv Syst. 2023; 39(7):1719-1736.

PMID: 37103517 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-023-05913-4.


Daily Folic Acid and/or Vitamin B12 Supplementation Between 6 and 30 Months of Age and Cardiometabolic Risk Markers After 6-7 Years: A Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Manapurath R, Strand T, Chowdhury R, Kvestad I, Yajnik C, Bhandari N J Nutr. 2023; 153(5):1493-1501.

PMID: 36889645 PMC: 10196576. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.03.003.


Conversion of calcium-l-methylfolate and (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid glucosamine salt into dietary folate equivalents.

Turck D, Bohn T, Castenmiller J, de Henauw S, Hirsch-Ernst K, Knutsen H EFSA J. 2022; 20(8):e07452.

PMID: 36034319 PMC: 9399872. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7452.