» Articles » PMID: 24199852

Increased Robustness of Single-molecule Counting with Microfluidics, Digital Isothermal Amplification, and a Mobile Phone Versus Real-time Kinetic Measurements

Overview
Journal Anal Chem
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2013 Nov 9
PMID 24199852
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Quantitative bioanalytical measurements are commonly performed in a kinetic format and are known to not be robust to perturbation that affects the kinetics itself or the measurement of kinetics. We hypothesized that the same measurements performed in a "digital" (single-molecule) format would show increased robustness to such perturbations. Here, we investigated the robustness of an amplification reaction (reverse-transcription loop-mediated amplification, RT-LAMP) in the context of fluctuations in temperature and time when this reaction is used for quantitative measurements of HIV-1 RNA molecules under limited-resource settings (LRS). The digital format that counts molecules using dRT-LAMP chemistry detected a 2-fold change in concentration of HIV-1 RNA despite a 6 °C temperature variation (p-value = 6.7 × 10(-7)), whereas the traditional kinetic (real-time) format did not (p-value = 0.25). Digital analysis was also robust to a 20 min change in reaction time, to poor imaging conditions obtained with a consumer cell-phone camera, and to automated cloud-based processing of these images (R(2) = 0.9997 vs true counts over a 100-fold dynamic range). Fluorescent output of multiplexed PCR amplification could also be imaged with the cell phone camera using flash as the excitation source. Many nonlinear amplification schemes based on organic, inorganic, and biochemical reactions have been developed, but their robustness is not well understood. This work implies that these chemistries may be significantly more robust in the digital, rather than kinetic, format. It also calls for theoretical studies to predict robustness of these chemistries and, more generally, to design robust reaction architectures. The SlipChip that we used here and other digital microfluidic technologies already exist to enable testing of these predictions. Such work may lead to identification or creation of robust amplification chemistries that enable rapid and precise quantitative molecular measurements under LRS. Furthermore, it may provide more general principles describing robustness of chemical and biological networks in digital formats.

Citing Articles

Deep Learning Enabled Universal Multiplexed Fluorescence Detection for Point-of-Care Applications.

Kshirsagar A, Politza A, Guan W ACS Sens. 2024; 9(8):4017-4027.

PMID: 39010300 PMC: 11421847. DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.4c00860.


A digital image colorimetry system based on smart devices for immediate and simultaneous determination of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

Mirhosseini S, Faghih Nasiri A, Khatami F, Mirzaei A, Aghamir S, Kolahdouz M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):2587.

PMID: 38297148 PMC: 10830485. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52931-6.


Picoliter Droplet Generation and Dense Bead-in-Droplet Encapsulation via Microfluidic Devices Fabricated via 3D Printed Molds.

Anyaduba T, Otoo J, Schlappi T Micromachines (Basel). 2022; 13(11).

PMID: 36363966 PMC: 9695966. DOI: 10.3390/mi13111946.


Recent Advances in Single-Molecule Sensors Based on STM Break Junction Measurements.

Lv S, Zeng C, Yu Z, Zheng J, Wang Y, Shao Y Biosensors (Basel). 2022; 12(8).

PMID: 35892462 PMC: 9329744. DOI: 10.3390/bios12080565.


Portable real-time colorimetric LAMP-device for rapid quantitative detection of nucleic acids in crude samples.

Papadakis G, Pantazis A, Fikas N, Chatziioannidou S, Tsiakalou V, Michaelidou K Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):3775.

PMID: 35260588 PMC: 8904468. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06632-7.


References
1.
Zhu H, Isikman S, Mudanyali O, Greenbaum A, Ozcan A . Optical imaging techniques for point-of-care diagnostics. Lab Chip. 2012; 13(1):51-67. PMC: 3510351. DOI: 10.1039/c2lc40864c. View

2.
Yager P, Edwards T, Fu E, Helton K, Nelson K, Tam M . Microfluidic diagnostic technologies for global public health. Nature. 2006; 442(7101):412-8. DOI: 10.1038/nature05064. View

3.
Martinez A, Phillips S, Carrilho E, Thomas 3rd S, Sindi H, Whitesides G . Simple telemedicine for developing regions: camera phones and paper-based microfluidic devices for real-time, off-site diagnosis. Anal Chem. 2008; 80(10):3699-707. PMC: 3761971. DOI: 10.1021/ac800112r. View

4.
Gansen A, Herrick A, Dimov I, Lee L, Chiu D . Digital LAMP in a sample self-digitization (SD) chip. Lab Chip. 2012; 12(12):2247-54. PMC: 3383853. DOI: 10.1039/c2lc21247a. View

5.
Lucchetta E, Lee J, Fu L, Patel N, Ismagilov R . Dynamics of Drosophila embryonic patterning network perturbed in space and time using microfluidics. Nature. 2005; 434(7037):1134-8. PMC: 2656922. DOI: 10.1038/nature03509. View