» Articles » PMID: 24193000

Plant-animal Interactions in Suburban Environments: Implications for Floral Evolution

Overview
Journal Oecologia
Date 2013 Nov 7
PMID 24193000
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Plant interactions with mutualists and antagonists vary remarkably across space, and have played key roles in the ecology and evolution of flowering plants. One dominant form of spatial variation is human modification of the landscape, including urbanization and suburbanization. Our goal was to assess how suburbanization affected plant-animal interactions in Gelsemium sempervirens in the southeastern United States, including interactions with mutualists (pollination) and antagonists (nectar robbing and florivory). Based on differences in plant-animal interactions measured in multiple replicate sites, we then developed predictions for how these differences would affect patterns of natural selection, and we explored the patterns using measurements of floral and defensive traits in the field and in a common garden. We found that Gelsemium growing in suburban sites experienced more robbing and florivory as well as more heterospecific but not conspecific pollen transfer. Floral traits, particularly corolla length and width, influenced the susceptibility of plants to particular interactors. Observational data of floral traits measured in the field and in a common garden provided some supporting but also some conflicting evidence for the hypothesis that floral traits evolved in response to differences in species interactions in suburban vs. wild sites. However, the degree to which plants can respond to any one interactor may be constrained by correlations among floral morphological traits. Taken together, consideration of the broader geographic context in which organisms interact, in both suburban and wild areas, is fundamental to our understanding of the forces that shape contemporary plant-animal interactions and selection pressures in native species.

Citing Articles

Socioecological drivers of mutualistic and antagonistic plant-insect interactions and interaction outcomes in suburban landscapes.

Fitch G, Adler L, Irwin R, Warren P PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0312143.

PMID: 39546538 PMC: 11567518. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312143.


Pollen limitation of native plant reproduction in an urban landscape.

Carper A, Warren P, Adler L, Irwin R Am J Bot. 2022; 109(12):1969-1980.

PMID: 36200335 PMC: 10092213. DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.16080.


Phenotypic and genotypic divergence of plant-herbivore interactions along an urbanization gradient.

Qu J, Bonte D, Vandegehuchte M Evol Appl. 2022; 15(5):865-877.

PMID: 35603025 PMC: 9108311. DOI: 10.1111/eva.13376.


Multivariate phenotypic divergence along an urbanization gradient.

Santangelo J, Rivkin L, Advenard C, Thompson K Biol Lett. 2020; 16(9):20200511.

PMID: 32991825 PMC: 7532719. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0511.


Variation in pollinator-mediated plant reproduction across an urbanization gradient.

Rivkin L, Nhan V, Weis A, Johnson M Oecologia. 2020; 192(4):1073-1083.

PMID: 32062703 DOI: 10.1007/s00442-020-04621-z.


References
1.
Greenleaf S, Williams N, Winfree R, Kremen C . Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size. Oecologia. 2007; 153(3):589-96. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-007-0752-9. View

2.
Leege L, Wolfe L . Do floral herbivores respond to variation in flower characteristics in Gelsemium sempervirens (Loganiaceae), a distylous vine?. Am J Bot. 2011; 89(8):1270-4. DOI: 10.3732/ajb.89.8.1270. View

3.
Adler L, Irwin R . Nectar alkaloids decrease pollination and female reproduction in a native plant. Oecologia. 2011; 168(4):1033-41. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2153-3. View

4.
Cane J, Minckley R, Kervin L, Roulston T, Williams N . Complex responses within a desert bee guild (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) to urban habitat fragmentation. Ecol Appl. 2006; 16(2):632-44. DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[0632:crwadb]2.0.co;2. View

5.
Cheptou P, Carrue O, Rouifed S, Cantarel A . Rapid evolution of seed dispersal in an urban environment in the weed Crepis sancta. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(10):3796-9. PMC: 2268839. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0708446105. View