» Articles » PMID: 32062703

Variation in Pollinator-mediated Plant Reproduction Across an Urbanization Gradient

Overview
Journal Oecologia
Date 2020 Feb 17
PMID 32062703
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Urbanization alters the landscape, degrades and fragments habitats, and can have a profound effect on species interactions. Plant-pollinator networks may be particularly sensitive to urbanization, because plants and their insect pollinators have been shown to respond to urbanization both positively and negatively. To better understand the relationship between urbanization, pollinator behavior, and season on pollinator-mediated plant reproduction, we created 30 experimental plant populations along an urbanization gradient in the Greater Toronto Area, Canada. To test how urbanization affects plant reproduction and between-patch pollen dispersal, we created a standard hermaphroditic plant patch at each site, and a male-sterile plant patch at a subset of sites. We measured plant reproduction in the early and late summer in each of 2 years. Plants in urban sites produced significantly fewer flowers than plants in the nonurban sites, whereas seed number per plant either increased or decreased with urbanization, depending on the season. Experimental populations in urban sites also exhibited reduced pollen dispersal between patches. Pollen dispersal between patches was greatest early in the summer and declined with increased impervious surface and proximity to the city. Together, our results are likely caused by variation in environmental conditions and pollinator services across the urban gradient, resulting in pollen limitation and pollen dispersal differences among sites. Our work adds to the small but growing body of literature on urban plant-pollinator interactions and suggests that responses to urbanization are context-dependent.

Citing Articles

Is urbanization a driver of aboveground biomass allocation in a widespread tropical shrub, Turnera subulata (Turneroideae - Passifloraceae)?.

Seixas L, Barao K, Lopes R, Serafim D, Demetrio G J Plant Res. 2024; 137(5):879-892.

PMID: 39014142 DOI: 10.1007/s10265-024-01560-1.


Differential impacts of land-use change on multiple components of common milkweed () pollination success.

Rockow D, Martel C, Arceo-Gomez G Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(6):e11494.

PMID: 38855315 PMC: 11156956. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11494.


Urban environment decreases pollinator availability, fertility, and prolongs anthesis in the field bindweed ( Linnaeus, 1753).

Prokop P Plant Signal Behav. 2024; 19(1):2325225.

PMID: 38448395 PMC: 10936644. DOI: 10.1080/15592324.2024.2325225.


Variation in flower size and shape of is correlated with urbanization in Montreal, Canada.

Faure J, Volz V, Joly S Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(12):e10826.

PMID: 38094148 PMC: 10716670. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10826.


Urbanization and a green corridor do not impact genetic divergence in common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca L.).

Breitbart S, Agrawal A, Wagner H, Johnson M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):20437.

PMID: 37993590 PMC: 10665382. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47524-8.


References
1.
Yakub M, Tiffin P . Living in the city: urban environments shape the evolution of a native annual plant. Glob Chang Biol. 2016; 23(5):2082-2089. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13528. View

2.
Baldock K, Goddard M, Hicks D, Kunin W, Mitschunas N, Morse H . A systems approach reveals urban pollinator hotspots and conservation opportunities. Nat Ecol Evol. 2019; 3(3):363-373. PMC: 6445365. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-018-0769-y. View

3.
Nasrallah J, Nasrallah M . The molecular genetics of self-incompatibility in Brassica. Annu Rev Genet. 1989; 23:121-39. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ge.23.120189.001005. View

4.
Burkle L, Alarcon R . The future of plant-pollinator diversity: understanding interaction networks across time, space, and global change. Am J Bot. 2011; 98(3):528-38. DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1000391. View

5.
Ushimaru A, Kobayashi A, Dohzono I . Does urbanization promote floral diversification? Implications from changes in herkogamy with pollinator availability in an urban-rural area. Am Nat. 2014; 184(2):258-67. DOI: 10.1086/676855. View