» Articles » PMID: 24169780

Identification and Characterisation of Sugarcane Intergeneric Hybrids, Saccharum Officinarum X Erianthus Arundinaceus, with Molecular Markers and DNA in Situ Hybridisation

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Genetics
Date 2013 Oct 31
PMID 24169780
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Molecular markers were used to characterise sugarcane intergeneric hybrids between S. officinarum and E. arundinaceus. Very simple diagnostic tools for hybrid identification among the progeny were derived from isozyme electrophoresis and a sequence-tagged PCR. Two enzyme systems (GOT and MDH B) and PCR amplification revealing spacer-size variation in the 5s-rDNA cluster were found most convenient. Specific characterisation of the two genomic components was possible using RFLP and in situ hybridisation. The strong molecular differentiation between S. officinarum and E. arundinaceus allows the identification of numerous Erianthus-specific RFLP bands in the hybrids. Genomic DNA in situ hybridisation allows for the differentiation of the chromosomes contributed by S. officinarum and E. arundinaceus in chromosome preparations of the hybrids. In situ hybridisation with the 18s-5.8s-25s rDNA probe highlights the basic chromosome numbers in the two parental species. The potential of these techniques to monitor the Erianthus genome during the introgression process is discussed.

Citing Articles

Deciphering Winter Sprouting Potential of Derived Sugarcane Hybrids under Subtropical Climates.

Meena M, Mohanraj K, Kumar R, Kumar R, Chhabra M, Kulshreshtha N Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(7).

PMID: 38611552 PMC: 11013679. DOI: 10.3390/plants13071023.


Cytogenetic Characterization and Metabolomic Differences of Full-Sib Progenies of spp.

Wang Y, Li R, Chen B Plants (Basel). 2023; 12(4).

PMID: 36840158 PMC: 9968213. DOI: 10.3390/plants12040810.


Reconstruction of karyotypic evolution in Saccharum spontaneum species by comparative oligo-FISH mapping.

Meng Z, Wang F, Xie Q, Li R, Shen H, Li H BMC Plant Biol. 2022; 22(1):599.

PMID: 36539690 PMC: 9764494. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-022-04008-7.


Evaluation of genome size and phylogenetic relationships of the complex species.

Ling K, Yi-Ning D, Majeed A, Zi-Jiang Y, Jun-Wen C, Li-Lian H 3 Biotech. 2022; 12(11):327.

PMID: 36276474 PMC: 9582063. DOI: 10.1007/s13205-022-03338-5.


Comparative Analysis of Chloroplast Genome in spp. and Related Members of ' Complex'.

Li S, Duan W, Zhao J, Jing Y, Feng M, Kuang B Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(14).

PMID: 35887005 PMC: 9315705. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23147661.


References
1.
DHont A, Lu Y, Leon D, Grivet L, Feldmann P, Lanaud C . A molecular approach to unraveling the genetics of sugarcane, a complex polyploid of the Andropogoneae tribe. Genome. 1994; 37(2):222-30. DOI: 10.1139/g94-031. View

2.
Gerlach W, Bedbrook J . Cloning and characterization of ribosomal RNA genes from wheat and barley. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979; 7(7):1869-85. PMC: 342353. DOI: 10.1093/nar/7.7.1869. View

3.
Heslop-Harrison J, HARRISON G, Leitch I . Reprobing of DNA:DNA in situ hybridization preparations. Trends Genet. 1992; 8(11):372-3. DOI: 10.1016/0168-9525(92)90287-e. View

4.
Cox A, Bennett M, Dyer T . Use of the polymerase chain reaction to detect spacer size heterogeneity in plant 5S-rRNA gene clusters and to locate such clusters in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2013; 83(6-7):684-90. DOI: 10.1007/BF00226685. View

5.
Klimyuk V, Carroll B, Thomas C, Jones J . Alkali treatment for rapid preparation of plant material for reliable PCR analysis. Plant J. 1993; 3(3):493-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.1993.tb00169.x. View