The Influence of Hamstring Autograft Size on Patient-reported Outcomes and Risk of Revision After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Cohort Study
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of graft size on patient-reported outcomes and revision risk after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
Methods: A retrospective chart review of prospectively collected cohort data was performed, and 263 of 320 consecutive patients (82.2%) undergoing primary ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft were evaluated. We recorded graft size; femoral tunnel drilling technique; patient age, sex, and body mass index at the time of ACL reconstruction; Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and International Knee Documentation Committee score preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively; and whether each patient underwent revision ACL reconstruction during the 2-year follow-up period. Revision was used as a marker for graft failure. The relation between graft size and patient-reported outcomes was determined by multiple linear regression. The relation between graft size and risk of revision was determined by dichotomizing graft size at 8 mm and stratifying by age.
Results: After we controlled for age, sex, operative side, surgeon, body mass index, graft choice, and femoral tunnel drilling technique, a 1-mm increase in graft size was noted to correlate with a 3.3-point increase in the KOOS pain subscale (P = .003), a 2.0-point increase in the KOOS activities of daily living subscale (P = .034), a 5.2-point increase in the KOOS sport/recreation function subscale (P = .004), and a 3.4-point increase in the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score (P = .026). Revision was required in 0 of 64 patients (0.0%) with grafts greater than 8 mm in diameter and 14 of 199 patients (7.0%) with grafts 8 mm in diameter or smaller (P = .037). Among patients aged 18 years or younger, revision was required in 0 of 14 patients (0.0%) with grafts greater than 8 mm in diameter and 13 of 71 patients (18.3%) with grafts 8 mm in diameter or smaller.
Conclusions: Smaller hamstring autograft size is a predictor of poorer KOOS sport/recreation function 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction. A larger sample size is required to confirm the relation between graft size and risk of revision ACL reconstruction.
Level Of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Is There a Hamstring Autograft Diameter Threshold for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?.
Mirzayan R, Chang R, Royse K, Reyes C, Prentice H, Maletis G Orthop J Sports Med. 2025; 13(2):23259671241305427.
PMID: 40034609 PMC: 11872734. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241305427.
Bouras T, Lianou I, Filippopoulos A, Lakoumentas J, Ntourantonis D J Clin Med. 2025; 14(3).
PMID: 39941496 PMC: 11818362. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14030825.
Crutchfield C, Lowenstein N, Leite C, Lattermann C, Matzkin E Orthop J Sports Med. 2025; 13(2):23259671241307559.
PMID: 39926588 PMC: 11806466. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241307559.
Fan L, Zhang L, Tang J, Xu Z, Fu W J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):809.
PMID: 39609872 PMC: 11606057. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05310-w.
Petit C, Hussain Z, McPherson A, Petushek E, Montalvo A, White M Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(11):23259671241289140.
PMID: 39583150 PMC: 11585031. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241289140.