» Articles » PMID: 24140144

The Influence of Hamstring Autograft Size on Patient-reported Outcomes and Risk of Revision After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Arthroscopy
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2013 Oct 22
PMID 24140144
Citations 151
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of graft size on patient-reported outcomes and revision risk after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of prospectively collected cohort data was performed, and 263 of 320 consecutive patients (82.2%) undergoing primary ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft were evaluated. We recorded graft size; femoral tunnel drilling technique; patient age, sex, and body mass index at the time of ACL reconstruction; Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and International Knee Documentation Committee score preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively; and whether each patient underwent revision ACL reconstruction during the 2-year follow-up period. Revision was used as a marker for graft failure. The relation between graft size and patient-reported outcomes was determined by multiple linear regression. The relation between graft size and risk of revision was determined by dichotomizing graft size at 8 mm and stratifying by age.

Results: After we controlled for age, sex, operative side, surgeon, body mass index, graft choice, and femoral tunnel drilling technique, a 1-mm increase in graft size was noted to correlate with a 3.3-point increase in the KOOS pain subscale (P = .003), a 2.0-point increase in the KOOS activities of daily living subscale (P = .034), a 5.2-point increase in the KOOS sport/recreation function subscale (P = .004), and a 3.4-point increase in the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score (P = .026). Revision was required in 0 of 64 patients (0.0%) with grafts greater than 8 mm in diameter and 14 of 199 patients (7.0%) with grafts 8 mm in diameter or smaller (P = .037). Among patients aged 18 years or younger, revision was required in 0 of 14 patients (0.0%) with grafts greater than 8 mm in diameter and 13 of 71 patients (18.3%) with grafts 8 mm in diameter or smaller.

Conclusions: Smaller hamstring autograft size is a predictor of poorer KOOS sport/recreation function 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction. A larger sample size is required to confirm the relation between graft size and risk of revision ACL reconstruction.

Level Of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Citing Articles

Is There a Hamstring Autograft Diameter Threshold for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?.

Mirzayan R, Chang R, Royse K, Reyes C, Prentice H, Maletis G Orthop J Sports Med. 2025; 13(2):23259671241305427.

PMID: 40034609 PMC: 11872734. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241305427.


Use of Anthropometric Data for the Prediction of Four-Strand Hamstring Graft Size in White Caucasian Population.

Bouras T, Lianou I, Filippopoulos A, Lakoumentas J, Ntourantonis D J Clin Med. 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39941496 PMC: 11818362. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14030825.


Evaluating Donor-Recipient Sex Mismatch in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Allograft: Outcomes at 2 Years Postoperatively.

Crutchfield C, Lowenstein N, Leite C, Lattermann C, Matzkin E Orthop J Sports Med. 2025; 13(2):23259671241307559.

PMID: 39926588 PMC: 11806466. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241307559.


Comparison of clinical outcomes between hamstring tendon autografts and hybrid grafts in ACL reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fan L, Zhang L, Tang J, Xu Z, Fu W J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):809.

PMID: 39609872 PMC: 11606057. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05310-w.


Graft Failure in Pediatric Patients After Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone, Hamstring Tendon, or Quadriceps Tendon Autograft ACLR: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Petit C, Hussain Z, McPherson A, Petushek E, Montalvo A, White M Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(11):23259671241289140.

PMID: 39583150 PMC: 11585031. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241289140.


References
1.
Wright R, Magnussen R, Dunn W, Spindler K . Ipsilateral graft and contralateral ACL rupture at five years or more following ACL reconstruction: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93(12):1159-65. PMC: 3110421. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00898. View

2.
Wright R, Dunn W, Amendola A, Andrish J, Bergfeld J, Kaeding C . Risk of tearing the intact anterior cruciate ligament in the contralateral knee and rupturing the anterior cruciate ligament graft during the first 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective MOON cohort study. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35(7):1131-4. DOI: 10.1177/0363546507301318. View

3.
Borchers J, Pedroza A, Kaeding C . Activity level and graft type as risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament graft failure: a case-control study. Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37(12):2362-7. DOI: 10.1177/0363546509340633. View

4.
Tuman J, Diduch D, Rubino L, Baumfeld J, Nguyen H, Hart J . Predictors for hamstring graft diameter in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35(11):1945-9. DOI: 10.1177/0363546507304667. View

5.
Irrgang J, Anderson A, Boland A, Harner C, Neyret P, Richmond J . Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34(10):1567-73. DOI: 10.1177/0363546506288855. View