» Articles » PMID: 22688502

Factors Predicting Hamstring Tendon Autograft Diameters and Resulting Failure Rates After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2012 Jun 13
PMID 22688502
Citations 92
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purposes of this study are to confirm factors that affect the diameter of hamstring tendon autograft and to compare failure rates between the factors after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Methods: A total of 296 patients that underwent reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft at our clinics for ACL injury between September 2005 and June 2008 were enrolled for this study. The diameters of gracilis and semitendinosus tendons (harvested from the affected knee) and four-strand graft tendon made by folding the gracilis and semitendinosus tendons in two layers were measured. Before operating, we recorded the age, height, weight, Body Mass Index (BMI), gender and athlete versus non-athlete identity of the subjects and checked their correlations with graft diameters. Patients that recorded a grade C or D on the International Knee Documentation Committee Knee Examination Form, as well as patients that underwent revision, were defined as failures and analysed by related factors.

Results: The mean diameter was 1.5 mm ± 0.2 for gracilis tendon, 2.2 mm ± 0.3 for semitendinosus tendon and 7.2 mm ± 0.7 for graft tendon. Except for age, factors including height, weight, BMI, gender and athlete versus non-athlete identity were found to be significantly related to graft diameter. Correlation was strongest with height (p < 0.001). With respect to failure rates after ACL reconstruction, patients with a graft diameter of 8.0 mm or more demonstrated statistically better results than patients with a diameter of below 8.0 mm (p = 0.043). However, failure rates did not differ significantly with respect to other factors.

Conclusions: The diameter of hamstring tendon autograft may be different depending on height, weight, BMI and gender of the patient, as well as whether or not the patient is an athlete. Although we did not find statistically significant differences in failure rates after ACL reconstruction, this study demonstrated relatively better results in patients with a graft diameter of 8.0 mm or more.

Level Of Evidence: Case series, Level IV.

Citing Articles

Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements of Hamstring Tendons' Cross-Sectional Area May Be Used to Predict the 5-Stranded Graft Diameter in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Ayres J, Ose B, Morey T, Brown E, Mar D, Henkelman E Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2025; 7(1):101001.

PMID: 40041840 PMC: 11873528. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.101001.


Is There a Hamstring Autograft Diameter Threshold for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?.

Mirzayan R, Chang R, Royse K, Reyes C, Prentice H, Maletis G Orthop J Sports Med. 2025; 13(2):23259671241305427.

PMID: 40034609 PMC: 11872734. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241305427.


Use of Anthropometric Data for the Prediction of Four-Strand Hamstring Graft Size in White Caucasian Population.

Bouras T, Lianou I, Filippopoulos A, Lakoumentas J, Ntourantonis D J Clin Med. 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39941496 PMC: 11818362. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14030825.


Evaluating Donor-Recipient Sex Mismatch in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Allograft: Outcomes at 2 Years Postoperatively.

Crutchfield C, Lowenstein N, Leite C, Lattermann C, Matzkin E Orthop J Sports Med. 2025; 13(2):23259671241307559.

PMID: 39926588 PMC: 11806466. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241307559.


Minimizing Unnecessary Harvesting of an Extremely Thin Gracilis Tendon During ACL Reconstruction by Referencing the Diameter of the Doubled Semitendinosus Tendon Alone.

Yau W Orthop J Sports Med. 2025; 13(1):23259671241307561.

PMID: 39763501 PMC: 11701913. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241307561.


References
1.
Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Menchetti P, Giron F . Arthroscopically assisted semitendinosus and gracilis tendon graft in reconstruction for acute anterior cruciate ligament injuries in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 1996; 24(6):726-31. DOI: 10.1177/036354659602400605. View

2.
Ristanis S, Stergiou N, Patras K, Vasiliadis H, Giakas G, Georgoulis A . Excessive tibial rotation during high-demand activities is not restored by anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2005; 21(11):1323-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.08.032. View

3.
SIEGEL M, Barber-Westin S . Arthroscopic-assisted outpatient anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. Arthroscopy. 1998; 14(3):268-77. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(98)70142-2. View

4.
Borchers J, Pedroza A, Kaeding C . Activity level and graft type as risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament graft failure: a case-control study. Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37(12):2362-7. DOI: 10.1177/0363546509340633. View

5.
Charlton W, Randolph Jr D, Lemos S, Shields Jr C . Clinical outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadrupled hamstring tendon graft and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation. Am J Sports Med. 2003; 31(4):518-21. DOI: 10.1177/03635465030310040701. View