» Articles » PMID: 16870824

Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form

Overview
Journal Am J Sports Med
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2006 Jul 28
PMID 16870824
Citations 169
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form was developed to measure change in symptoms, function, and sports activity in patients treated for a variety of knee conditions. Although previous research has demonstrated reliability and validity of the form, its responsiveness has not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to determine responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form.

Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 1.

Methods: Patients who participated in the original validation study for the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form completed the form and a 7-level global rating of change scale that ranged from greatly worse to greatly better after a mean of 1.6 years (range, 0.5-2.3 years). Analyses included calculation of the standardized response mean and mean change in International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form score compared to the patient's perception of change on the global rating of change scale. In addition, a receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted to determine the change in score that best distinguished patients who improved from those who did not.

Results: The overall standardized response mean was 0.94, which is considered large. With the exception of those who were slightly worse or unchanged, the mean change in the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form score compared to the patients' perceived global ratings of change was as expected (greatly worse, -15.1; somewhat worse, -8.4; slightly worse, 20.6; no change, 10.7; slightly better, 5.9; somewhat better, 18.1; greatly better, 38.7). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that a change score of 11.5 points had the highest sensitivity, and a change score of 20.5 points had the highest specificity to distinguish between those who were or were not improved.

Conclusion: The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form is a responsive measure of symptoms, function, and sports activity for patients with a variety of knee conditions.

Citing Articles

Establishing metrics of clinically meaningful change for treating knee osteoarthritis with a combination of autologous orthobiologics.

Centeno C, Ghattas J, Dodson E, Steinmetz N, Murphy M, Berger D Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):7244.

PMID: 40021765 PMC: 11871318. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-91972-3.


Modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors affecting surgical failure after revision ACL reconstruction: a cohort study.

Moon H, Jung M, Choi C, Chung K, Jung S, Byun J Knee Surg Relat Res. 2024; 36(1):37.

PMID: 39587700 PMC: 11590207. DOI: 10.1186/s43019-024-00243-4.


Nutritional intervention to enhance recovery after arthroscopic knee surgery in adults: a randomized controlled pilot trial.

Nyman D, Pufahl C, Hickey O, Stokes T, Simpson C, Selinger J Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024; 10(1):138.

PMID: 39533408 PMC: 11556091. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-024-01561-w.


Effect of Graft Choice for ACL Reconstruction on Clinical Outcomes in Combined ACL and MCL Injuries: Comparison Between Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Hamstring Autografts.

Chung K, Ham H, Kim S, Seo Y J Clin Med. 2024; 13(21).

PMID: 39518456 PMC: 11546250. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13216316.


Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Thai Version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Patellofemoral Pain and Osteoarthritis (KOOS-PF).

Reosanguanwong K, Suphakitchanusan W, Lertwanich P Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(10):23259671241279465.

PMID: 39464203 PMC: 11504075. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241279465.