» Articles » PMID: 24121413

The Price of Racial Bias: Intergroup Negotiations in the Ultimatum Game

Overview
Journal Psychol Sci
Specialty Psychology
Date 2013 Oct 15
PMID 24121413
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Existing stereotypes about Black Americans may influence perceptions of intent during financial negotiations. In this study, we explored whether the influence of race on economic decisions extends to choices that are costly to the decision maker. We investigated whether racial group membership contributes to differential likelihood of rejection of objectively equal unfair monetary offers. In the Ultimatum Game, players accept or reject proposed splits of money. Players keep accepted splits, but if a player rejects an offer, both the player and the proposer receive nothing. We found that participants accepted more offers and lower offer amounts from White proposers than from Black proposers, and that this pattern was accentuated for participants with higher implicit race bias. These findings indicate that participants are willing to discriminate against Black proposers even at a cost to their own financial gain.

Citing Articles

The impact of group membership on punishment versus partner rejection.

Loustau T, Glassman J, Martin J, Young L, McAuliffe K Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):22238.

PMID: 39333223 PMC: 11436655. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-69206-9.


A psycholinguistic study of intergroup bias and its cultural propagation.

Schmidtke D, Kuperman V Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):8613.

PMID: 38616210 PMC: 11016536. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58905-y.


Biracial Faces Offer Visual Cues of Successful Intergroup Contact: Genetic Admixture and Coalition Detection.

Wang X, Miller G Evol Psychol. 2024; 22(1):14747049241238623.

PMID: 38477637 PMC: 10938625. DOI: 10.1177/14747049241238623.


Explicit discrimination and ingroup favoritism, but no implicit biases in hypothetical triage decisions during COVID-19.

Gradwohl N, Neth H, Giese H, Gaissmaier W Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):1213.

PMID: 38216652 PMC: 10786932. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50385-w.


Which is More Important, Proposer Identity or Allocation Motive? Event-Related Potential in Economic Decision-Making.

Zhang R, Meng Y, Tian Y, Zou T Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023; 16:3845-3856.

PMID: 37724137 PMC: 10505400. DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S420608.


References
1.
Diekmann K, Samuels S, Ross L, Bazerman M . Self-interest and fairness in problems of resource allocation: allocators versus recipients. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997; 72(5):1061-74. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.72.5.1061. View

2.
Taijfel H . Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Sci Am. 1970; 223(5):96-102. View

3.
Sanfey A, Rilling J, Aronson J, Nystrom L, Cohen J . The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. Science. 2003; 300(5626):1755-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1082976. View

4.
van t Wout M, Kahn R, Sanfey A, Aleman A . Affective state and decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. Exp Brain Res. 2006; 169(4):564-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0346-5. View

5.
Sabin J, Nosek B, Greenwald A, Rivara F . Physicians' implicit and explicit attitudes about race by MD race, ethnicity, and gender. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2009; 20(3):896-913. PMC: 3320738. DOI: 10.1353/hpu.0.0185. View