» Articles » PMID: 16489438

Affective State and Decision-making in the Ultimatum Game

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2006 Feb 21
PMID 16489438
Citations 114
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The emerging field of neuroeconomics has provided evidence that emotional as well as cognitive processes may contribute to economic decision-making. Indeed, activation of the anterior insula, a brain area involved in emotional processing, has been shown to predict decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. However, as the insula has also been implicated in other brain functions, converging evidence on the role of emotion in the Ultimatum Game is needed. In the present study, 30 healthy undergraduate students played the Ultimatum Game while their skin conductance responses were measured as an autonomic index of affective state. The results revealed that skin conductance activity was higher for unfair offers and was associated with the rejection of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game. Interestingly, this pattern was only observed for offers proposed by human conspecifics, but not for offers generated by computers. This provides direct support for economic models that acknowledge the role of emotional brain systems in everyday decision-making.

Citing Articles

Distinct neural computations scale the violation of expected reward and emotion in social transgressions.

Xu T, Zhang L, Zhou F, Fu K, Gan X, Chen Z Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):106.

PMID: 39838081 PMC: 11751440. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07561-7.


The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Characteristics on Employee Green Behavior: A Moral Emotions Perspective.

Zhang N, Ren X, Sun X, Jin C Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 39594345 PMC: 11590960. DOI: 10.3390/bs14111045.


An evaluation of the Ultimatum Game as a measure of irritability and anger.

Grondal M, Ask K, Winblad S PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0304038.

PMID: 39150923 PMC: 11329143. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304038.


Electrophysiological correlates of why humans deviate from rational decision-making: A registered replication study.

Rodrigues J, Weiss M, Hein G, Hewig J Psychophysiology. 2024; 62(1):e14665.

PMID: 39138761 PMC: 11775885. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14665.


The consequences of AI training on human decision-making.

Treiman L, Ho C, Kool W Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(33):e2408731121.

PMID: 39106305 PMC: 11331131. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2408731121.


References
1.
Sanfey A, Rilling J, Aronson J, Nystrom L, Cohen J . The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. Science. 2003; 300(5626):1755-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1082976. View

2.
Camerer C . Psychology and economics. Strategizing in the brain. Science. 2003; 300(5626):1673-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.1086215. View

3.
Maia T, McClelland J . A reexamination of the evidence for the somatic marker hypothesis: what participants really know in the Iowa gambling task. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(45):16075-80. PMC: 528759. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0406666101. View

4.
Bechara A, Damasio H, Tranel D, Damasio A . The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: some questions and answers. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005; 9(4):159-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.02.002. View

5.
Phillips M, Young A, Senior C, Brammer M, Andrew C, Calder A . A specific neural substrate for perceiving facial expressions of disgust. Nature. 1997; 389(6650):495-8. DOI: 10.1038/39051. View