» Articles » PMID: 38616210

A Psycholinguistic Study of Intergroup Bias and Its Cultural Propagation

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Apr 14
PMID 38616210
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Intergroup bias is the tendency for people to inflate positive regard for their in-group and derogate the out-group. Across two online experiments (N = 922) this study revisits the methodological premises of research on language as a window into intergroup bias. Experiment 1 examined (i) whether the valence (positivity) of language production differs when communicating about an in- vs. out-group, and (ii) whether the extent of this bias is influenced by the positivity of input descriptors that were initially presented to participants as examples of how an in-group or out-group characterize themselves. Experiment 2 used the linear diffusion chain method to examine how biases are transmitted through cultural generations. Valence of verbal descriptions were quantified using ratings obtained from a large-scale psycholinguistic database. The findings from Experiment 1 indicated a bias towards employing positive language in describing the in-group (exhibiting in-group favoritism), particularly in cases where the input descriptors were negative. However, there was weak evidence for increased negativity aimed at the out-group (i.e., out-group derogation). The findings from Experiment 2 demonstrated that in-group positivity bias propagated across cultural generations at a higher rate than out-group derogation. The results shed light on the formation and cultural transmission of intergroup bias.

References
1.
Martin D, Hutchison J, Slessor G, Urquhart J, Cunningham S, Smith K . The spontaneous formation of stereotypes via cumulative cultural evolution. Psychol Sci. 2014; 25(9):1777-86. DOI: 10.1177/0956797614541129. View

2.
Warriner A, Kuperman V, Brysbaert M . Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behav Res Methods. 2013; 45(4):1191-207. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x. View

3.
Fazio R, Jackson J, Dunton B, Williams C . Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: a bona fide pipeline?. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995; 69(6):1013-27. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.69.6.1013. View

4.
Gao C, Shinkareva S, Peelen M . Affective valence of words differentially affects visual and auditory word recognition. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022; 151(9):2144-2159. PMC: 7616442. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001176. View

5.
Esses V . Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants. Annu Rev Psychol. 2020; 72:503-531. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-080520-102803. View