» Articles » PMID: 38434341

Comparing the Risk of Deep Vein Thrombosis of Two Combined Oral Contraceptives: Norethindrone/ethinyl Estradiol and Drospirenone/ethinyl Estradiol

Overview
Journal Heliyon
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2024 Mar 4
PMID 38434341
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has been reported as an adverse event for patients receiving combined oral contraceptives. Norethindrone/ethinyl estradiol (NET/EE) and drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol (DRSP/EE) are two commonly prescribed combined hormonal oral contraceptive agents used in the United States, differing in their progestin component.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the association between the progestin component of a combined oral contraceptive and the risk of DVT in patients taking oral contraceptives for birth control using data derived from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Methods: The risk of DVT was compared between patients that had taken NET/EE with those that had taken the DRSP/EE COC formulation for birth control. In addition, age was assessed as a possible confounder and the outcome severity for those diagnosed with DVT were compared between the two groups. Finally, association rule mining was utilized to identify possible drug-drug interactions that result in elevated DVT risk.

Results: DVT was the fourth most commonly adverse event reported for patients taking DRSP/EE accounting for 8558 cases and the seventeenth most commonly reported adverse event for NET/EE accounting for 298 cases. Age was found to be a significant confounder for users of DRSP/EE with regards to DVT risk across all age groups assessed: 20<Age ≤ 30 (ROR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.23-1.45), 30<Age ≤ 40 (ROR = 2.16, 95% CI 1.98-2.35), and Age>40 (ROR = 3.69, 95% CI 3.37-4.04) However, there was only a statistically significant elevated risk in patients over 40 years of age taking NET/EE (ROR = 1.98, 95% CI 1.36-2.88). Patients that had taken DRSP/EE and the corticosteroid prednisone simultaneously had an approximately 3-fold increase in DVT risk (ROR = 2.77, 95% CI 2.43-3.15) relative to individuals that had only taken DRSP/EE.

Conclusion: Based on this analysis, there is a higher risk of developing DVT when taking DRSP/EE than when taking NET/EE as hormonal contraception. In addition, a possibly significant drug-drug interaction between different COC formulations and prednisone were identified. This interaction may result in elevated DVT risk due to a synergistic impairment of fibrinolysis and a decrease in plasmin production.

References
1.
Farris M, Bastianelli C, Rosato E, Brosens I, Benagiano G . Pharmacodynamics of combined estrogen-progestin oral contraceptives: 2. effects on hemostasis. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2017; 10(10):1129-1144. DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2017.1356718. View

2.
Tchaikovski S, Rosing J . Mechanisms of estrogen-induced venous thromboembolism. Thromb Res. 2010; 126(1):5-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2010.01.045. View

3.
Quezada A, Jimenez D, Bikdeli B, Moores L, Porres-Aguilar M, Aramberri M . Systolic blood pressure and mortality in acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism. Int J Cardiol. 2019; 302:157-163. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.11.102. View

4.
Christin-Maitre S . History of oral contraceptive drugs and their use worldwide. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013; 27(1):3-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.beem.2012.11.004. View

5.
Dragoman M . The combined oral contraceptive pill -- recent developments, risks and benefits. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014; 28(6):825-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.06.003. View