» Articles » PMID: 23966881

Characterization of the P53 Cistrome--DNA Binding Cooperativity Dissects P53's Tumor Suppressor Functions

Overview
Journal PLoS Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2013 Aug 23
PMID 23966881
Citations 63
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

p53 protects us from cancer by transcriptionally regulating tumor suppressive programs designed to either prevent the development or clonal expansion of malignant cells. How p53 selects target genes in the genome in a context- and tissue-specific manner remains largely obscure. There is growing evidence that the ability of p53 to bind DNA in a cooperative manner prominently influences target gene selection with activation of the apoptosis program being completely dependent on DNA binding cooperativity. Here, we used ChIP-seq to comprehensively profile the cistrome of p53 mutants with reduced or increased cooperativity. The analysis highlighted a particular relevance of cooperativity for extending the p53 cistrome to non-canonical binding sequences characterized by deletions, spacer insertions and base mismatches. Furthermore, it revealed a striking functional separation of the cistrome on the basis of cooperativity; with low cooperativity genes being significantly enriched for cell cycle and high cooperativity genes for apoptotic functions. Importantly, expression of high but not low cooperativity genes was correlated with superior survival in breast cancer patients. Interestingly, in contrast to most p53-activated genes, p53-repressed genes did not commonly contain p53 binding elements. Nevertheless, both the degree of gene activation and repression were cooperativity-dependent, suggesting that p53-mediated gene repression is largely indirect and mediated by cooperativity-dependently transactivated gene products such as CDKN1A, E2F7 and non-coding RNAs. Since both activation of apoptosis genes with non-canonical response elements and repression of pro-survival genes are crucial for p53's apoptotic activity, the cistrome analysis comprehensively explains why p53-induced apoptosis, but not cell cycle arrest, strongly depends on the intermolecular cooperation of p53 molecules as a possible safeguard mechanism protecting from accidental cell killing.

Citing Articles

The Ashkenazi-Centric G334R Variant of is Severely Impaired for Transactivation but Retains Tumor Suppressor Function in a Mouse Model.

Stieg D, Casey K, Karisetty B, Leu J, Larkin F, Vogel P Mol Cell Biol. 2024; 44(12):607-621.

PMID: 39520074 PMC: 11583612. DOI: 10.1080/10985549.2024.2421885.


Epistatic interactions between NMD and TRP53 control progenitor cell maintenance and brain size.

Lin L, Zhao J, Kubota N, Li Z, Lam Y, Nguyen L Neuron. 2024; 112(13):2157-2176.e12.

PMID: 38697111 PMC: 11446168. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2024.04.006.


The Role of Mutations in -Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Clinical Significance and Implications for Therapy.

Canale M, Andrikou K, Priano I, Cravero P, Pasini L, Urbini M Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(5).

PMID: 35267450 PMC: 8909869. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051143.


Partial p53 reactivation is sufficient to induce cancer regression.

Klimovich B, Meyer L, Merle N, Neumann M, Konig A, Ananikidis N J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2022; 41(1):80.

PMID: 35232479 PMC: 8889716. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-022-02269-6.


Tumour-suppressing functions of the lncRNA MBNL1-AS1/miR-889-3p/KLF9 axis in human breast cancer cells.

Jin Y, Xu L, Zhao B, Bao W, Ye Y, Tong Y Cell Cycle. 2022; 21(9):908-920.

PMID: 35112997 PMC: 9037535. DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2022.2034254.


References
1.
Bulger M, Groudine M . Functional and mechanistic diversity of distal transcription enhancers. Cell. 2011; 144(3):327-39. PMC: 3742076. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.01.024. View

2.
Miller L, Smeds J, George J, Vega V, Vergara L, Ploner A . An expression signature for p53 status in human breast cancer predicts mutation status, transcriptional effects, and patient survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(38):13550-5. PMC: 1197273. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0506230102. View

3.
Balagurumoorthy P, Lindsay S, Harrington R . Atomic force microscopy reveals kinks in the p53 response element DNA. Biophys Chem. 2002; 101-102:611-23. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4622(02)00169-2. View

4.
Kel A, Voss N, Jauregui R, Kel-Margoulis O, Wingender E . Beyond microarrays: find key transcription factors controlling signal transduction pathways. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006; 7 Suppl 2:S13. PMC: 1683568. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-S2-S13. View

5.
Espinosa J, Verdun R, Emerson B . p53 functions through stress- and promoter-specific recruitment of transcription initiation components before and after DNA damage. Mol Cell. 2003; 12(4):1015-27. DOI: 10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00359-9. View