» Articles » PMID: 23894621

A Conserved Aspartic Acid is Important for Agonist (VUAA1) and Odorant/tuning Receptor-dependent Activation of the Insect Odorant Co-receptor (Orco)

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Jul 30
PMID 23894621
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Insect odorant receptors function as heteromeric odorant-gated cation channels comprising a conventional odorant-sensitive tuning receptor, and a conserved co-receptor (Orco). An Orco agonist, VUAA1, is able to activate both heteromeric and homomeric Orco-containing channels. Very little is known about specific residues in Orco that contribute to cation permeability and gating. We investigated the importance of two conserved Asp residues, one in each of transmembrane domains 5 and 7, for channel function by mutagenesis. Drosophila melanogaster Orco and its substitution mutants were expressed in HEK cells and VUAA1-stimulated channel activity was determined by Ca(2+) influx and whole-cell patch clamp electrophysiology. Substitution of D466 in transmembrane 7 with amino acids other than glutamic acid resulted in a substantial reduction in channel activity. The D466E Orco substitution mutant was ~2 times more sensitive to VUAA1. The permeability of the D466E Orco mutant to cations was unchanged relative to wild-type Orco. When D466E Orco is co-expressed with a conventional tuning odorant receptor, the heteromeric complex also shows increased sensitivity to an odorant. Thus, the effect of the D466E mutation is not specific to VUAA1 agonism or dependent on homomeric Orco assembly. We suggest the gain-of-activation characteristic of the D466E mutant identifies an amino acid that is likely to be important for activation of both heteromeric and homomeric insect odorant receptor channels.

Citing Articles

Rational engineering approaches for establishing insect olfaction reporters in yeast.

Hoch-Schneider E, Saleski T, Jensen E, Jensen M Biotechnol Notes. 2024; 4:90-99.

PMID: 39416924 PMC: 11446376. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotno.2023.11.002.


Elucidation of the structural basis for ligand binding and translocation in conserved insect odorant receptor co-receptors.

Pacalon J, Audic G, Magnat J, Philip M, Golebiowski J, Moreau C Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):8182.

PMID: 38081900 PMC: 10713630. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-44058-5.


Silencing the odorant receptor co-receptor impairs olfactory reception in a sensillum-specific manner in the cockroach.

Tateishi K, Watanabe T, Nishino H, Mizunami M, Watanabe H iScience. 2022; 25(5):104272.

PMID: 35521537 PMC: 9065313. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104272.


Enantiomeric Discrimination in Insects: The Role of OBPs and ORs.

Sims C, Birkett M, Withall D Insects. 2022; 13(4).

PMID: 35447810 PMC: 9030700. DOI: 10.3390/insects13040368.


Altered functional properties of the codling moth Orco mutagenized in the intracellular loop-3.

Bobkov Y, Walker Iii W, Cattaneo A Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):3893.

PMID: 33594162 PMC: 7887336. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83024-3.


References
1.
Lundin C, Kall L, Kreher S, Kapp K, Sonnhammer E, Carlson J . Membrane topology of the Drosophila OR83b odorant receptor. FEBS Lett. 2007; 581(29):5601-4. PMC: 2176074. DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.11.007. View

2.
Deng Y, Zhang W, Farhat K, Oberland S, Gisselmann G, Neuhaus E . The stimulatory Gα(s) protein is involved in olfactory signal transduction in Drosophila. PLoS One. 2011; 6(4):e18605. PMC: 3072409. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018605. View

3.
Nakagawa T, Sakurai T, Nishioka T, Touhara K . Insect sex-pheromone signals mediated by specific combinations of olfactory receptors. Science. 2005; 307(5715):1638-42. DOI: 10.1126/science.1106267. View

4.
Jones P, Pask G, Rinker D, Zwiebel L . Functional agonism of insect odorant receptor ion channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(21):8821-5. PMC: 3102409. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1102425108. View

5.
Nakagawa T, Pellegrino M, Sato K, Vosshall L, Touhara K . Amino acid residues contributing to function of the heteromeric insect olfactory receptor complex. PLoS One. 2012; 7(3):e32372. PMC: 3293798. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032372. View