» Articles » PMID: 23850852

Diagnostic Performance of Four Point of Care Cardiac Troponin I Assays to Rule in and Rule out Acute Myocardial Infarction

Overview
Journal Clin Biochem
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2013 Jul 16
PMID 23850852
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of four point-of-care (POC) cardiac troponin I (cTnI) assays compared to a central laboratory cTnI assay for detecting myocardial injury and diagnosing acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Design And Methods: Plasma obtained at admission, 3 h, and 6 h post-admission in 169 patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was studied. cTnI concentrations were measured on the Instrumentation Laboratory prototype GEM Immuno, Radiometer AQT90, Mitsubishi PATHFAST, Abbott i-STAT and the Ortho-Clinical Diagnostic Vitros assays. MI was determined based on 99th percentiles according to Universal MI guidelines.

Results: For ruling in MI at presentation (0 h), the GEM Immuno (sensitivity 63%, specificity 85%) and PATHFAST (sensitivity 53%, specificity 86%) were comparable to the OCD (sensitivity 68%, specificity 81%), and significantly better (p<0.05) than the AQT90 (sensitivity 26%, specificity 93%) and i-STAT (sensitivity 32%, specificity 92%). cTnI concentrations and serial rising patterns after MI differed by each assay. Negative predictive values were >90% and ROC AUCs were >0.90 after 6h for all assays. Detection of myocardial injury in non-ischemic pathologies accounted for lower than 100% specificity for MI.

Conclusion: cTnI is a sensitive biomarker for detection of myocardial injury. The analytical variability that exists between POC cTnI assays demonstrates substantial diagnostic differences for ruling in and ruling out MI in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of ACS.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Two Commercially Available Immunoassays for the Measurement of Bovine Cardiac Troponin I in Cattle With Induced Myocardial Injury.

Smith J, Varga A, Schober K Front Vet Sci. 2020; 7:531.

PMID: 33062647 PMC: 7481330. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00531.


How to choose a point-of-care testing for troponin.

Lin Y, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Cui K, Kang J, Zhou Z J Clin Lab Anal. 2020; 34(7):e23263.

PMID: 32222055 PMC: 7370753. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.23263.


HDL Particle Size and Functionality Comparison between Patients with and without Confirmed Acute Myocardial Infarction.

de Miranda Teixeira R, Cruz de Sa N, Caires Dos Santos A, Anjos E Silva V, Christine de Magalhaes Cabral Albuquerque E, Correia L Cardiol Res Pract. 2019; 2019:3074602.

PMID: 30944734 PMC: 6421720. DOI: 10.1155/2019/3074602.


Multi-centre evaluation of recent troponin assays for the diagnosis of NSTEMI.

Chenevier-Gobeaux C, Deweerdt L, Cantero A, Renaud B, Desmaizieres B, Charpentier S Pract Lab Med. 2018; 11:23-32.

PMID: 30014015 PMC: 6045566. DOI: 10.1016/j.plabm.2018.02.003.


Can non-clinical repolarization assays predict the results of clinical thorough QT studies? Results from a research consortium.

Park E, Gintant G, Bi D, Kozeli D, Pettit S, Pierson J Br J Pharmacol. 2017; 175(4):606-617.

PMID: 29181850 PMC: 5786459. DOI: 10.1111/bph.14101.