» Articles » PMID: 33062647

Comparison of Two Commercially Available Immunoassays for the Measurement of Bovine Cardiac Troponin I in Cattle With Induced Myocardial Injury

Overview
Journal Front Vet Sci
Date 2020 Oct 16
PMID 33062647
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Multiple cardiac troponin I (cTnI) immunoassays are commercially available. Overall, assays have not been standardized, and inter-assay differences in the detection of the analyte cardiac troponin I can be clinically relevant. To compare the diagnostic accuracy of the commercially available Abbott i-STAT®1 cTnI immunoassay (i-STAT) and the previously validated ADVIA Centaur TnI-Ultra immunoassay (Centaur) in cattle. There will be significant differences in bovine serum cTnI results measured by the Centaur and i-STAT methods. Ten dairy cows with experimentally induced myocardial injury due to monensin administration. Thirty apparently healthy dairy cows with no history of monensin exposure served as controls. Blood was collected at various time points after administration of a single dose of monensin (20 to 50 mg/kg) via orogastric tube. A total of 112 blood samples were collected. Cardiac TnI concentration was analyzed with the two methods and the association between methods analyzed via linear regression. Bland-Altman analysis to evaluate agreement between methods was performed on samples divided into groups (cTnI < 1.0 ng/mL and cTnI ≥ 1.0 ng/mL). Analyzer results were linearly correlated with each other ( = 0.931). Samples with cTnI concentrations <1.0 ng/mL had a bias of -0.13 ± 0.20 ng/mL and samples with cTnI concentrations >1.0 ng/mL had a bias of -9.81 ± 13.26 ng/mL. The results of this study reveal that cTnI concentrations determined with the i-STAT are systematically lower compared to the concentrations determined by the Centaur.

Citing Articles

Genetic characterization of diagnostic epitopes of cardiac troponin I in African rhinoceros.

Rautenbach Y, Parsons S, Loots A, Goddard A, Meyer L, Buss P J Vet Diagn Invest. 2024; 37(2):263-271.

PMID: 39725868 PMC: 11672365. DOI: 10.1177/10406387241305323.

References
1.
Ungerer J, Marquart L, ORourke P, Wilgen U, Pretorius C . Concordance, variance, and outliers in 4 contemporary cardiac troponin assays: implications for harmonization. Clin Chem. 2011; 58(1):274-83. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.175059. View

2.
Serra M, Papakonstantinou S, Adamcova M, OBrien P . Veterinary and toxicological applications for the detection of cardiac injury using cardiac troponin. Vet J. 2010; 185(1):50-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.04.013. View

3.
Apple F, Murakami M, Christenson R, Campbell J, Miller C, Hock K . Analytical performance of the i-STAT cardiac troponin I assay. Clin Chim Acta. 2004; 345(1-2):123-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.cccn.2004.03.010. View

4.
Labonte J, Dubuc J, Roy J, Buczinski S . Prognostic Value of Cardiac Troponin I and L-Lactate in Blood of Dairy Cows Affected by Downer Cow Syndrome. J Vet Intern Med. 2017; 32(1):484-490. PMC: 5787165. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.14874. View

5.
Varga A, Schober K, Holloman C, Stromberg P, Lakritz J, Rings D . Correlation of serum cardiac troponin I and myocardial damage in cattle with monensin toxicosis. J Vet Intern Med. 2009; 23(5):1108-16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2009.0355.x. View