» Articles » PMID: 23805152

The DNA Damage Response in Mammalian Oocytes

Overview
Journal Front Genet
Date 2013 Jun 28
PMID 23805152
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

DNA damage is one of the most common insults that challenge all cells. To cope, an elaborate molecular and cellular response has evolved to sense, respond to and correct the damage. This allows the maintenance of DNA fidelity essential for normal cell viability and the prevention of genomic instability that can lead to tumor formation. In the context of oocytes, the impact of DNA damage is not one of tumor formation but of the maintenance of fertility. Mammalian oocytes are particularly vulnerable to DNA damage because physiologically they may lie dormant in the ovary for many years (>40 in humans) until they receive the stimulus to grow and acquire the competence to become fertilized. The implication of this is that in some organisms, such as humans, oocytes face the danger of cumulative genetic damage for decades. Thus, the ability to detect and repair DNA damage is essential to maintain the supply of oocytes necessary for reproduction. Therefore, failure to confront DNA damage in oocytes could cause serious anomalies in the embryo that may be propagated in the form of mutations to the next generation allowing the appearance of hereditary disease. Despite the potential impact of DNA damage on reproductive capacity and genetic fidelity of embryos, the mechanisms available to the oocyte for monitoring and repairing such insults have remained largely unexplored until recently. Here, we review the different aspects of the response to DNA damage in mammalian oocytes. Specifically, we address the oocyte DNA damage response from embryonic life to adulthood and throughout oocyte development.

Citing Articles

Novel BRCA1-PLK1-CIP2A axis orchestrates homologous recombination-mediated DNA repair to maintain chromosome integrity during oocyte meiosis.

Lee C, Oh J Nucleic Acids Res. 2024; 53(2.

PMID: 39657788 PMC: 11754672. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae1207.


The DNA double-strand break repair proteins γH2AX, RAD51, BRCA1, RPA70, KU80, and XRCC4 exhibit follicle-specific expression differences in the postnatal mouse ovaries from early to older ages.

Talibova G, Bilmez Y, Tire B, Ozturk S J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(9):2419-2439.

PMID: 39023827 PMC: 11405603. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03189-4.


Mechanism of chromosomal mosaicism in preimplantation embryos and its effect on embryo development.

Zhang X, Zheng P J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(5):1127-1141.

PMID: 38386118 PMC: 11143108. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03048-2.


Distinct characteristics of the DNA damage response in mammalian oocytes.

Leem J, Lee C, Choi D, Oh J Exp Mol Med. 2024; 56(2):319-328.

PMID: 38355825 PMC: 10907590. DOI: 10.1038/s12276-024-01178-2.


Single-cell and bulk transcriptional profiling of mouse ovaries reveals novel genes and pathways associated with DNA damage response in oocytes.

Mills M, Emori C, Kumar P, Boucher Z, George J, Bolcun-Filas E bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38352597 PMC: 10862846. DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.02.578648.


References
1.
Meulmeester E, Jochemsen A . p53: a guide to apoptosis. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2008; 8(2):87-97. DOI: 10.2174/156800908783769337. View

2.
Mehlmann L, Jones T, Jaffe L . Meiotic arrest in the mouse follicle maintained by a Gs protein in the oocyte. Science. 2002; 297(5585):1343-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.1073978. View

3.
Bartek J, Bartkova J, Lukas J . DNA damage signalling guards against activated oncogenes and tumour progression. Oncogene. 2007; 26(56):7773-9. DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210881. View

4.
Burgoyne P, Mahadevaiah S, Turner J . The management of DNA double-strand breaks in mitotic G2, and in mammalian meiosis viewed from a mitotic G2 perspective. Bioessays. 2007; 29(10):974-86. DOI: 10.1002/bies.20639. View

5.
Ciccia A, Elledge S . The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol Cell. 2010; 40(2):179-204. PMC: 2988877. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019. View