» Articles » PMID: 38355825

Distinct Characteristics of the DNA Damage Response in Mammalian Oocytes

Overview
Journal Exp Mol Med
Date 2024 Feb 14
PMID 38355825
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

DNA damage is a critical threat that poses significant challenges to all cells. To address this issue, cells have evolved a sophisticated molecular and cellular process known as the DNA damage response (DDR). Among the various cell types, mammalian oocytes, which remain dormant in the ovary for extended periods, are particularly susceptible to DNA damage. The occurrence of DNA damage in oocytes can result in genetic abnormalities, potentially leading to infertility, birth defects, and even abortion. Therefore, understanding how oocytes detect and repair DNA damage is of paramount importance in maintaining oocyte quality and preserving fertility. Although the fundamental concept of the DDR is conserved across various cell types, an emerging body of evidence reveals striking distinctions in the DDR between mammalian oocytes and somatic cells. In this review, we highlight the distinctive characteristics of the DDR in oocytes and discuss the clinical implications of DNA damage in oocytes.

Citing Articles

Novel BRCA1-PLK1-CIP2A axis orchestrates homologous recombination-mediated DNA repair to maintain chromosome integrity during oocyte meiosis.

Lee C, Oh J Nucleic Acids Res. 2024; 53(2.

PMID: 39657788 PMC: 11754672. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae1207.


deficiency causes oocyte ferroptosis.

Zhang Z, Yu R, Shi Q, Wu Z, Li Q, Mu J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(45):e2406174121.

PMID: 39471219 PMC: 11551447. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2406174121.


Oocyte-specific deletion of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5 causes apoptosis of mouse oocytes within the early-growing follicles by mitochondrial fission defect-reactive oxygen species-DNA damage.

Wang W, Liu H, Liu S, Hao T, Wei Y, Wei H Clin Transl Med. 2024; 14(8):e1791.

PMID: 39113233 PMC: 11306288. DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.1791.


The DNA double-strand break repair proteins γH2AX, RAD51, BRCA1, RPA70, KU80, and XRCC4 exhibit follicle-specific expression differences in the postnatal mouse ovaries from early to older ages.

Talibova G, Bilmez Y, Tire B, Ozturk S J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(9):2419-2439.

PMID: 39023827 PMC: 11405603. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03189-4.

References
1.
Abuetabh Y, Wu H, Chai C, Al Yousef H, Persad S, Sergi C . DNA damage response revisited: the p53 family and its regulators provide endless cancer therapy opportunities. Exp Mol Med. 2022; 54(10):1658-1669. PMC: 9636249. DOI: 10.1038/s12276-022-00863-4. View

2.
Jackson S, Bartek J . The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature. 2009; 461(7267):1071-8. PMC: 2906700. DOI: 10.1038/nature08467. View

3.
Lavin M . Ataxia-telangiectasia: from a rare disorder to a paradigm for cell signalling and cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008; 9(10):759-69. DOI: 10.1038/nrm2514. View

4.
Smits V, Gillespie D . DNA damage control: regulation and functions of checkpoint kinase 1. FEBS J. 2015; 282(19):3681-92. DOI: 10.1111/febs.13387. View

5.
Ciccia A, Elledge S . The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol Cell. 2010; 40(2):179-204. PMC: 2988877. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019. View