Single-cell and Bulk Transcriptional Profiling of Mouse Ovaries Reveals Novel Genes and Pathways Associated with DNA Damage Response in Oocytes

Overview

Journal bioRxiv

Date 2024 Feb 14

PMID 38352597

Authors

Monique Mills

Chihiro Emori

Parveen Kumar

Zachary Boucher

Joshy George

Ewelina Bolcun-Filas

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Immature oocytes enclosed in primordial follicles stored in female ovaries are under constant threat of DNA damage induced by endogenous and exogenous factors. Checkpoint kinase 2 (CHEK2) is a key mediator of the DNA damage response in all cells. Genetic studies have shown that CHEK2 and its downstream targets, p53 and TAp63, regulate primordial follicle elimination in response to DNA damage, however the mechanism leading to their demise is still poorly characterized. Single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing were used to determine the DNA damage response in wildtype and -deficient ovaries. A low but oocyte-lethal dose of ionizing radiation induces a DNA damage response in ovarian cells that is solely dependent on CHEK2. DNA damage activates multiple ovarian response pathways related to apoptosis, p53, interferon signaling, inflammation, cell adhesion, and intercellular communication. These pathways are differentially employed by different ovarian cell types, with oocytes disproportionately affected by radiation. Novel genes and pathways are induced by radiation specifically in oocytes, shedding light on their sensitivity to DNA damage, and implicating a coordinated response between oocytes and pre-granulosa cells within the follicle. These findings provide a foundation for future studies on the specific mechanisms regulating oocyte survival in the context of aging, as well as therapeutic and environmental genotoxic exposures.

References

Samarajiwa S, Forster S, Auchettl K, Hertzog P . INTERFEROME: the database of interferon regulated genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008; 37(Database issue):D852-7. PMC: 2686605. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkn732. View

Hoch N . Tissue Specificity of DNA Damage and Repair. Physiology (Bethesda). 2023; 38(5). DOI: 10.1152/physiol.00006.2023. View

Mootha V, Lindgren C, Eriksson K, Subramanian A, Sihag S, Lehar J . PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat Genet. 2003; 34(3):267-73. DOI: 10.1038/ng1180. View

Ginjala V, Nacerddine K, Kulkarni A, Oza J, Hill S, Yao M . BMI1 is recruited to DNA breaks and contributes to DNA damage-induced H2A ubiquitination and repair. Mol Cell Biol. 2011; 31(10):1972-82. PMC: 3133356. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00981-10. View

Kawase T, Ohki R, Shibata T, Tsutsumi S, Kamimura N, Inazawa J . PH domain-only protein PHLDA3 is a p53-regulated repressor of Akt. Cell. 2009; 136(3):535-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.002. View

Wardlaw C, Petrini J . ISG15: A link between innate immune signaling, DNA replication, and genome stability. Bioessays. 2023; 45(7):e2300042. PMC: 10473822. DOI: 10.1002/bies.202300042. View

Roberts O, Paraoan L . PERP-ing into diverse mechanisms of cancer pathogenesis: Regulation and role of the p53/p63 effector PERP. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2020; 1874(1):188393. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188393. View

Neilsen P, Cheney K, Li C, Chen J, Cawrse J, Schulz R . Identification of ANKRD11 as a p53 coactivator. J Cell Sci. 2008; 121(Pt 21):3541-52. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.026351. View

Kimler B, Briley S, Johnson B, Armstrong A, Jasti S, Duncan F . Radiation-induced ovarian follicle loss occurs without overt stromal changes. Reproduction. 2018; 155(6):553-562. PMC: 5951174. DOI: 10.1530/REP-18-0089. View

10.

Aran D, Looney A, Liu L, Wu E, Fong V, Hsu A . Reference-based analysis of lung single-cell sequencing reveals a transitional profibrotic macrophage. Nat Immunol. 2019; 20(2):163-172. PMC: 6340744. DOI: 10.1038/s41590-018-0276-y. View

11.

Shinoda K, Zong D, Callen E, Wu W, Dumitrache L, Belinky F . The dystonia gene THAP1 controls DNA double-strand break repair choice. Mol Cell. 2021; 81(12):2611-2624.e10. PMC: 8985095. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.03.034. View

12.

Sandy Z, da Costa I, Schmidt C . More than Meets the ISG15: Emerging Roles in the DNA Damage Response and Beyond. Biomolecules. 2020; 10(11). PMC: 7698331. DOI: 10.3390/biom10111557. View

13.

Larjava H, Plow E, Wu C . Kindlins: essential regulators of integrin signalling and cell-matrix adhesion. EMBO Rep. 2008; 9(12):1203-8. PMC: 2603460. DOI: 10.1038/embor.2008.202. View

14.

dAdda di Fagagna F . Living on a break: cellular senescence as a DNA-damage response. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008; 8(7):512-22. DOI: 10.1038/nrc2440. View

15.

Uhlen M, Fagerberg L, Hallstrom B, Lindskog C, Oksvold P, Mardinoglu A . Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science. 2015; 347(6220):1260419. DOI: 10.1126/science.1260419. View

16.

Eppig J . Reproduction: Oocytes Call, Granulosa Cells Connect. Curr Biol. 2018; 28(8):R354-R356. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.005. View

17.

Rinaldi V, Bolcun-Filas E, Kogo H, Kurahashi H, Schimenti J . The DNA Damage Checkpoint Eliminates Mouse Oocytes with Chromosome Synapsis Failure. Mol Cell. 2017; 67(6):1026-1036.e2. PMC: 5621520. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.07.027. View

18.

Spears N, Lopes F, Stefansdottir A, Rossi V, De Felici M, Anderson R . Ovarian damage from chemotherapy and current approaches to its protection. Hum Reprod Update. 2019; 25(6):673-693. PMC: 6847836. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmz027. View

19.

Quan N, Harris L, Halder R, Trinidad C, Johnson B, Horton S . Differential sensitivity of inbred mouse strains to ovarian damage in response to low-dose total body irradiation†. Biol Reprod. 2019; 102(1):133-144. PMC: 7334620. DOI: 10.1093/biolre/ioz164. View

20.

Tuppi M, Kehrloesser S, Coutandin D, Rossi V, Luh L, Strubel A . Oocyte DNA damage quality control requires consecutive interplay of CHK2 and CK1 to activate p63. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2018; 25(3):261-269. DOI: 10.1038/s41594-018-0035-7. View