» Articles » PMID: 16334898

Informational Masking of Speech in Children: Effects of Ipsilateral and Contralateral Distracters

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 2005 Dec 13
PMID 16334898
Citations 80
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Using a closed-set speech recognition paradigm thought to be heavily influenced by informational masking, auditory selective attention was measured in 38 children (ages 4-16 years) and 8 adults (ages 20-30 years). The task required attention to a monaural target speech message that was presented with a time-synchronized distracter message in the same ear. In some conditions a second distracter message or a speech-shaped noise was presented to the other ear. Compared to adults, children required higher target/distracter ratios to reach comparable performance levels, reflecting more informational masking in these listeners. Informational masking in most conditions was confirmed by the fact that a large proportion of the errors made by the listeners were contained in the distracter message(s). There was a monotonic age effect, such that even the children in the oldest age group (13.6-16 years) demonstrated poorer performance than adults. For both children and adults, presentation of an additional distracter in the contralateral ear significantly reduced performance, even when the distracter messages were produced by a talker of different sex than the target talker. The results are consistent with earlier reports from pure-tone masking studies that informational masking effects are much larger in children than in adults.

Citing Articles

Speech Recognition and Spatial Hearing in Young Adults With Down Syndrome: Relationships With Hearing Thresholds and Auditory Working Memory.

Anshu K, Kristensen K, Godar S, Zhou X, Hartley S, Litovsky R Ear Hear. 2024; 45(6):1568-1584.

PMID: 39090791 PMC: 11493531. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001549.


Auditory Sensory Gating: Effects of Noise.

Cheng F, Campbell J, Liu C Biology (Basel). 2024; 13(6).

PMID: 38927323 PMC: 11200888. DOI: 10.3390/biology13060443.


Neural Mechanisms of Nonauditory Effects of Noise Exposure on Special Populations.

Xue Z, Ling X, Zhao X, Geng L Noise Health. 2024; 26(121):70-81.

PMID: 38904804 PMC: 11530112. DOI: 10.4103/nah.nah_78_23.


Children's use of spatial and visual cues for release from perceptual masking.

Lalonde K, Peng Z, Halverson D, Dwyer G J Acoust Soc Am. 2024; 155(2):1559-1569.

PMID: 38393738 PMC: 10890829. DOI: 10.1121/10.0024766.


Speech recognition in noise task among children and young-adults: a pupillometry study.

Trau-Margalit A, Fostick L, Harel-Arbeli T, Nissanholtz-Gannot R, Taitelbaum-Swead R Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1188485.

PMID: 37425148 PMC: 10328119. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1188485.


References
1.
Gomes H, Molholm S, Christodoulou C, Ritter W, Cowan N . The development of auditory attention in children. Front Biosci. 2000; 5:D108-20. DOI: 10.2741/gomes. View

2.
Fallon M, Trehub S, Schneider B . Children's perception of speech in multitalker babble. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001; 108(6):3023-9. DOI: 10.1121/1.1323233. View

3.
Brungart D . Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001; 109(3):1101-9. DOI: 10.1121/1.1345696. View

4.
Brungart D . Evaluation of speech intelligibility with the coordinate response measure. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001; 109(5 Pt 1):2276-9. DOI: 10.1121/1.1357812. View

5.
Oh E, Wightman F, Lutfi R . Children's detection of pure-tone signals with random multitone maskers. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001; 109(6):2888-95. PMC: 2858975. DOI: 10.1121/1.1371764. View