» Articles » PMID: 23762403

Age at Menarche and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: a Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Jun 14
PMID 23762403
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Various observational studies have focused on the relationship between menarcheal age and the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the association is still controversial because of inconsistent results. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to assess this issue from epidemiological studies.

Methods: After a literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science for studies of menarcheal age and CRC risk published through the end of January 2013, we pooled the relative risks (RRs) from included studies using a fixed- or random-effects model and performed heterogeneity and publication bias analyses. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results: Eleven case-control and 11 cohort studies were eligible for inclusion in our analysis. The random-effects pooled RR for oldest versus youngest menarcheal age was 0.95 [95% confidence intervals (CIs) = 0.85-1.06], with significant heterogeneity (Q = 61.03, P<0.001, I (2) = 65.6%). When separately analyzed, case-control (RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.75-1.21) and cohort studies (RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.90-1.04) yielded similar results. Moreover, similar results were also observed among the subgroup analyses by study quality, population, exposure assessment, anatomic cancer site, subsite of colon cancer, and several potential important confounders and risk factors. There was no evidence of publication bias and significant heterogeneity between subgroups detected by meta-regression analyses.

Conclusions: Findings from this meta-analysis demonstrated that menarcheal age was not associated with the risk of CRC in humans. Further studies are warranted to stratify results by the subsite of colon cancer and menopause status in the future.

Citing Articles

Age at Menarche, age at Natural Menopause, and Risk of Lung and Colorectal Cancers: A Mendelian Randomization Study.

Denos M, Sun Y, Jiang L, Brumpton B, Mai X J Endocr Soc. 2023; 7(8):bvad077.

PMID: 37404243 PMC: 10315561. DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvad077.


Reproductive Factors and Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Population-Based Case-Control Study.

Amitay E, Niedermaier T, Alwers E, Chang-Claude J, Hoffmeister M, Brenner H JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2022; 6(4).

PMID: 35642982 PMC: 9251386. DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkac042.


Association of the Age at Menarche with Site-Specific Cancer Risks in Pooled Data from Nine Cohorts.

Fuhrman B, Moore S, Byrne C, Makhoul I, Kitahara C, Berrington de Gonzalez A Cancer Res. 2021; 81(8):2246-2255.

PMID: 33820799 PMC: 8137527. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-3093.


Hormonal and reproductive factors and reduction in the risk of colorectal cancer.

Rennert G, Rennert H, Pinchev M, Gruber S, Lavie O Eur J Cancer Prev. 2019; 29(3):229-237.

PMID: 31714342 PMC: 9903958. DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000538.


Female hormones and the risk of colorectal neoplasm.

Jung Y Korean J Intern Med. 2019; 34(5):982-984.

PMID: 31466433 PMC: 6718757. DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2019.261.


References
1.
Akhter M, Inoue M, Kurahashi N, Iwasaki M, Sasazuki S, Tsugane S . Reproductive factors, exogenous female hormone use and colorectal cancer risk: the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2008; 17(6):515-24. DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e3282f521f8. View

2.
Lee M, Whittemore A, Gallagher R, Jiao D, Zheng S, Zhou L . Reproductive factors and colorectal cancer risk among Chinese females. Cancer Res. 1991; 51(9):2307-11. View

3.
Begg C, Mazumdar M . Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994; 50(4):1088-101. View

4.
. Menarche, menopause, and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis, including 118 964 women with breast cancer from 117 epidemiological studies. Lancet Oncol. 2012; 13(11):1141-51. PMC: 3488186. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70425-4. View

5.
Hamling J, Lee P, Weitkunat R, Ambuhl M . Facilitating meta-analyses by deriving relative effect and precision estimates for alternative comparisons from a set of estimates presented by exposure level or disease category. Stat Med. 2007; 27(7):954-70. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3013. View