» Articles » PMID: 23084519

Menarche, Menopause, and Breast Cancer Risk: Individual Participant Meta-analysis, Including 118 964 Women with Breast Cancer from 117 Epidemiological Studies

Overview
Journal Lancet Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2012 Oct 23
PMID 23084519
Citations 415
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Menarche and menopause mark the onset and cessation, respectively, of ovarian activity associated with reproduction, and affect breast cancer risk. Our aim was to assess the strengths of their effects and determine whether they depend on characteristics of the tumours or the affected women.

Methods: Individual data from 117 epidemiological studies, including 118 964 women with invasive breast cancer and 306 091 without the disease, none of whom had used menopausal hormone therapy, were included in the analyses. We calculated adjusted relative risks (RRs) associated with menarche and menopause for breast cancer overall, and by tumour histology and by oestrogen receptor expression.

Findings: Breast cancer risk increased by a factor of 1·050 (95% CI 1·044-1·057; p<0·0001) for every year younger at menarche, and independently by a smaller amount (1·029, 1·025-1·032; p<0·0001), for every year older at menopause. Premenopausal women had a greater risk of breast cancer than postmenopausal women of an identical age (RR at age 45-54 years 1·43, 1·33-1·52, p<0·001). All three of these associations were attenuated by increasing adiposity among postmenopausal women, but did not vary materially by women's year of birth, ethnic origin, childbearing history, smoking, alcohol consumption, or hormonal contraceptive use. All three associations were stronger for lobular than for ductal tumours (p<0·006 for each comparison). The effect of menopause in women of an identical age and trends by age at menopause were stronger for oestrogen receptor-positive disease than for oestrogen receptor-negative disease (p<0·01 for both comparisons).

Interpretation: The effects of menarche and menopause on breast cancer risk might not be acting merely by lengthening women's total number of reproductive years. Endogenous ovarian hormones are more relevant for oestrogen receptor-positive disease than for oestrogen receptor-negative disease and for lobular than for ductal tumours.

Funding: Cancer Research UK.

Citing Articles

Bisphenol A and DDT disrupt adipocyte function in the mammary gland: implications for breast cancer risk and progression.

Bernhardt S, House C Front Oncol. 2025; 15:1490898.

PMID: 40034592 PMC: 11873108. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1490898.


Menopausal status, age at menopause and risk of all-cause mortality among Chinese women: findings from a 10-year prospective study.

Huang S, Gongye R, Zou S, Hee J, Tang K BMJ Public Health. 2025; 1(1):e000332.

PMID: 40017861 PMC: 11816857. DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000332.


Risk of second primary cancer in young breast cancer survivors: an important yet overlooked issue.

Liang X, Qin Y, Li P, Mo Y, Chen D Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2025; 17:17588359251321904.

PMID: 40012707 PMC: 11863263. DOI: 10.1177/17588359251321904.


Mechanism of action of genistein on breast cancer and differential effects of different age stages.

Xiang Z, Ma B, Pei X, Wang W, Gong W Pharm Biol. 2025; 63(1):141-155.

PMID: 39996512 PMC: 11864014. DOI: 10.1080/13880209.2025.2469607.


The association between age at menarche and infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Moosazadeh M, Bordbari A, Hashemi S, Ghasemi Tirtashi M, Kargar-Soleimanabad S Contracept Reprod Med. 2025; 10(1):15.

PMID: 39994726 PMC: 11853611. DOI: 10.1186/s40834-025-00346-7.


References
1.
Clemmesen J . STATISTICAL STUDIES IN THE AETIOLOGY OF MALIGNANT NEOPLASMS. II. BASIC TABLES, DENMARK 1943-57. SUPPLEMENT 174. II. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand Suppl (1926). 1965; 174:1-319. View

2.
Colditz G, Stampfer M, Willett W, Stason W, Rosner B, Hennekens C . Reproducibility and validity of self-reported menopausal status in a prospective cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 1987; 126(2):319-25. DOI: 10.1093/aje/126.2.319. View

3.
Easton D, Peto J, Babiker A . Floating absolute risk: an alternative to relative risk in survival and case-control analysis avoiding an arbitrary reference group. Stat Med. 1991; 10(7):1025-35. DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780100703. View

4.
Beral V, Bull D, Doll R, Peto R, Reeves G . Breast cancer and abortion: collaborative reanalysis of data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 83?000 women with breast cancer from 16 countries. Lancet. 2004; 363(9414):1007-16. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15835-2. View

5.
Key T, Appleby P, Reeves G, Roddam A, Helzlsouer K, Alberg A . Circulating sex hormones and breast cancer risk factors in postmenopausal women: reanalysis of 13 studies. Br J Cancer. 2011; 105(5):709-22. PMC: 3188939. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.254. View