High Prevalence of Isolated Sperm DNA Damage in Infertile Men with Advanced Paternal Age

Overview

Journal J Assist Reprod Genet

Publisher Springer

Specialties Genetics
Reproductive Medicine

Date 2013 Jun 1

PMID 23722935

Citations 38

Authors

Mausumi Das

Naif Al-Hathal

Maria San-Gabriel

Simon Phillips

Isaac-Jacques Kadoch

Francois Bissonnette

Hananel Holzer

Armand Zini

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Sperm DNA damage is associated with male infertility, lower pregnancy rates and pregnancy loss.

Objective: The primary aim of our study was to evaluate the prevalence of sperm DNA damage in younger and older men with normozoospermia.

Design, Setting And Participants: We obtained semen from 277 consecutive non-azoospermic men presenting for sperm DNA testing.

Outcome Measurements And Statistical Analysis: The main outcome measures included sperm % DNA fragmentation index (%DFI, using sperm chromatin structure assay), sperm concentration, motility and morphology, and, paternal age.

Results And Limitations: Sperm % DFI was positively correlated with paternal age (r = 0.20, P < 0.001) and inversely correlated % progressive motility (r = -0.16, P = 0.01). Sperm %DFI was significantly higher in older (≥40 years) compared to younger (<40 years) normozoospermic men (17 ± 13 vs. 12 ± 8, respectively P = 0.008), whereas, sperm concentration, progressive motility and morphology were not significantly different in these two groups. Moreover, the prevalence of high levels of sperm DNA damage (>30 % DFI) was significantly higher in older compared to younger normozoospermic men (17 % vs. 3 %, respectively, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The data indicate that a conventional semen analysis can often fail to detect a defect in spermatogenesis (high %DFI) in older men and suggest that infertile couples with advanced paternal age, including those with normal semen parameters, should consider sperm DNA testing as part of the couple evaluation.

Citing Articles

Proteomic analysis reveals the difference between the spermatozoa of young and old Sus scrofa.

Fan S, Xie F, Wang Q, Ye H, Tian Y, Liu Y Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):1433.

PMID: 39789055 PMC: 11718062. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-85515-z.

The effect of male factors on embryo morphokinetics: a retrospective analysis of 2726 blastocysts.

Pellegrini L, Gatti S, Navarro N, Hervas I, Marcos M, Viviana V J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(12):3467-3475.

PMID: 39370476 PMC: 11707112. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03275-7.

Sociodemographic Trends and Perinatal Outcomes in Fathers 50 Years and Older.

Ha A, Scott M, Zhang C, Li S, Langroudi A, Glover F JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(8):e2425269.

PMID: 39088214 PMC: 11294967. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.25269.

Paternal Age Amplifies Cryopreservation-Induced Stress in Human Spermatozoa.

Perez Casasus S, Luongo F, Haxhiu A, Orini M, Scupoli G, Governini L Cells. 2024; 13(7.

PMID: 38607064 PMC: 11011712. DOI: 10.3390/cells13070625.

Sperm DNA Fragmentation: causes, evaluation and management in male infertility.

Andrabi S, Ara A, Saharan A, Jaffar M, Gugnani N, Esteves S JBRA Assist Reprod. 2024; 28(2):306-319.

PMID: 38289201 PMC: 11152411. DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20230076.

References

Tomlinson M, Moffatt O, Manicardi G, Bizzaro D, Afnan M, Sakkas D . Interrelationships between seminal parameters and sperm nuclear DNA damage before and after density gradient centrifugation: implications for assisted conception. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16(10):2160-5. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.10.2160. View

Zini A, Bielecki R, Phang D, Zenzes M . Correlations between two markers of sperm DNA integrity, DNA denaturation and DNA fragmentation, in fertile and infertile men. Fertil Steril. 2001; 75(4):674-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01796-9. View

Giwercman A, Lindstedt L, Larsson M, Bungum M, Spano M, Levine R . Sperm chromatin structure assay as an independent predictor of fertility in vivo: a case-control study. Int J Androl. 2009; 33(1):e221-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.00995.x. View

Aitken R, Baker M, Sawyer D . Oxidative stress in the male germ line and its role in the aetiology of male infertility and genetic disease. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003; 7(1):65-70. DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61730-0. View

Wyrobek A, Eskenazi B, Young S, Arnheim N, Tiemann-Boege I, Jabs E . Advancing age has differential effects on DNA damage, chromatin integrity, gene mutations, and aneuploidies in sperm. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(25):9601-6. PMC: 1480453. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0506468103. View

Spano M, Bonde J, Hjollund H, Kolstad H, Cordelli E, Leter G . Sperm chromatin damage impairs human fertility. The Danish First Pregnancy Planner Study Team. Fertil Steril. 2000; 73(1):43-50. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00462-8. View

Zini A, Boman J, Jarvi K, Baazeem A . Varicocelectomy for infertile couples with advanced paternal age. Urology. 2008; 72(1):109-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.02.029. View

Muriel L, Goyanes V, Segrelles E, Gosalvez J, Alvarez J, Fernandez J . Increased aneuploidy rate in sperm with fragmented DNA as determined by the sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) test and FISH analysis. J Androl. 2006; 28(1):38-49. DOI: 10.2164/jandrol.106.000067. View

Bronet F, Martinez E, Gaytan M, Linan A, Cernuda D, Ariza M . Sperm DNA fragmentation index does not correlate with the sperm or embryo aneuploidy rate in recurrent miscarriage or implantation failure patients. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27(7):1922-9. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des148. View

10.

Irvine D, Twigg J, GORDON E, Fulton N, Milne P, Aitken R . DNA integrity in human spermatozoa: relationships with semen quality. J Androl. 2000; 21(1):33-44. View

11.

Kong A, Frigge M, Masson G, Besenbacher S, Sulem P, Magnusson G . Rate of de novo mutations and the importance of father's age to disease risk. Nature. 2012; 488(7412):471-5. PMC: 3548427. DOI: 10.1038/nature11396. View

12.

Zini A, Boman J, Belzile E, Ciampi A . Sperm DNA damage is associated with an increased risk of pregnancy loss after IVF and ICSI: systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2008; 23(12):2663-8. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den321. View

13.

Evenson D, Jost L, Marshall D, Zinaman M, Clegg E, Purvis K . Utility of the sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14(4):1039-49. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.4.1039. View

14.

Collins J, Barnhart K, Schlegel P . Do sperm DNA integrity tests predict pregnancy with in vitro fertilization?. Fertil Steril. 2007; 89(4):823-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.04.055. View

15.

Gandini L, Lombardo F, Paoli D, Caruso F, Eleuteri P, Leter G . Full-term pregnancies achieved with ICSI despite high levels of sperm chromatin damage. Hum Reprod. 2004; 19(6):1409-17. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh233. View

16.

Erenpreiss J, Elzanaty S, Giwercman A . Sperm DNA damage in men from infertile couples. Asian J Androl. 2008; 10(5):786-90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7262.2008.00417.x. View

17.

Zini A, Sigman M . Are tests of sperm DNA damage clinically useful? Pros and cons. J Androl. 2008; 30(3):219-29. DOI: 10.2164/jandrol.108.006908. View

18.

Cooper T, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S, Auger J, Baker H, Behre H . World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update. 2009; 16(3):231-45. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmp048. View

19.

Brinkworth M, Weinbauer G, Bergmann M, Nieschlag E . Apoptosis as a mechanism of germ cell loss in elderly men. Int J Androl. 1997; 20(4):222-8. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2605.1997.00056.x. View

20.

Marchetti F, Lowe X, Bishop J, Wyrobek A . Induction of chromosomal aberrations in mouse zygotes by acrylamide treatment of male germ cells and their correlation with dominant lethality and heritable translocations. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1997; 30(4):410-7. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2280(1997)30:4<410::aid-em6>3.0.co;2-m. View