» Articles » PMID: 23652713

Dependence of Reaction Time and Movement Speed on Task Complexity and Age

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2013 May 9
PMID 23652713
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: The aim of this study was to determine the differences in reaction time, reaction complexity, and movement speed depending on age.

Material And Methods: The study included 40 healthy subjects (20 young and 20 older women and men). The study was conducted at the Human Motorics Laboratory, Lithuanian Sports University. An analyzer DPA-1 of dynamic upper and lower limb movements was used for the research purposes.

Results: The reaction time of the right arm of the young subjects was 0.26 s (SD, 0.01) and that of the left arm was 0.25 s (SD, 0.02), when an accuracy task was performed. The reaction time of the older subjects was 0.29 s (SD, 0.03) and 0.28 s (SD, 0.03) for the right and left arms, respectively. The reaction time of the right leg of the young subjects was 0.26 s (SD, 0.02) and that of the left leg was 0.27 s (SD, 0.03). The reaction time of the right and left legs of the older subjects was 0.33 s (SD, 0.02) and 0.35 s (SD, 0.04), respectively. The reaction of the young subjects was almost two times faster compared with the older persons after the accuracy task with each limb was accomplished.

Conclusions: In case of movements with arms and legs, reaction time and movement speed directly depend on the complexity of a task. Reaction time and movement speed are slower for the older subjects in comparison with the young ones; the results worsen in proportion to the increasing complexity of a task.

Citing Articles

Pre-movement muscle co-contraction associated with motor performance deterioration under high reward conditions.

Senta N, Ushiba J, Takemi M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):16710.

PMID: 39030359 PMC: 11271558. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67630-5.


Energy expenditure estimation during activities of daily living in middle-aged and older adults using an accelerometer integrated into a hearing aid.

Stutz J, Eichenberger P, Stumpf N, Knobel S, Herbert N, Hirzel I Front Digit Health. 2024; 6:1400535.

PMID: 38952746 PMC: 11215182. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1400535.


Extended reality to assess post-stroke manual dexterity: contrasts between the classic box and block test, immersive virtual reality with controllers, with hand-tracking, and mixed-reality tests.

Everard G, Burton Q, Van de Sype V, Bibentyo T, Auvinet E, Edwards M J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024; 21(1):36.

PMID: 38491540 PMC: 10941416. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01332-x.


Validity and reliability of a ruler drop test to measure dual-task reaction time, choice reaction time and discrimination reaction time.

Ferreira S, Raimundo A, Del Pozo-Cruz J, Leite N, Pinto A, Marmeleira J Aging Clin Exp Res. 2024; 36(1):61.

PMID: 38451364 PMC: 10920456. DOI: 10.1007/s40520-024-02726-6.


The Simultaneous Assessment of Time and Motion Response during Dual Tasks.

Flavia M, Lucia D, Antonia L, Luigi P, Marco T, Manuela G Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(11).

PMID: 37300036 PMC: 10255977. DOI: 10.3390/s23115309.