The Simultaneous Assessment of Time and Motion Response During Dual Tasks

Overview

Journal Sensors (Basel)

Publisher MDPI

Specialty Biotechnology

Date 2023 Jun 10

PMID 37300036

Authors

Marrone Flavia

Donno Lucia

Lopreside Antonia

Piccinini Luigi

Tarabini Marco

Galli Manuela

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Measurement of reaction time in clinical settings is generally employed to assess cognitive abilities by having a subject perform standard simple tests. In this study, a new method of measuring response time (RT) was developed using a system composed of LEDs that emit light stimuli and are equipped with proximity sensors. The RT is measured as the time taken by the subject to turn off the LED target by moving the hand towards the sensor. Through an optoelectronic passive marker system, the associated motion response is assessed. Two tasks of 10 stimuli each were defined: simple reaction time and recognition reaction time tasks. To validate the method implemented to measure RTs, the reproducibility and repeatability of the measurements were estimated, and, to test the method's applicability, a pilot study was conducted on 10 healthy subjects (6 females and 4 males, age = 25 ± 2 years), reporting, as expected, that the response time was affected by the task's difficulty. Unlike commonly used tests, the developed method has proven to be adequate for the simultaneous evaluation of the response in terms of time and motion. Furthermore, thanks to the playful nature of the tests, this method could also be used for clinical and pediatric applications to measure the impact of motor and cognitive impairments on RT.

References

Morris C, Bartlett D . Gross Motor Function Classification System: impact and utility. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004; 46(1):60-5. DOI: 10.1017/s0012162204000118. View

Fozard J, Vercryssen M, Reynolds S, Hancock P, QUILTER R . Age differences and changes in reaction time: the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. J Gerontol. 1994; 49(4):P179-89. DOI: 10.1093/geronj/49.4.p179. View

Vater C, Gray R, Holcombe A . A critical systematic review of the Neurotracker perceptual-cognitive training tool. Psychon Bull Rev. 2021; 28(5):1458-1483. PMC: 8500884. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-01892-2. View

Wells A, Hoffman J, Beyer K, Jajtner A, Gonzalez A, Townsend J . Reliability of the dynavision™ d2 for assessing reaction time performance. J Sports Sci Med. 2014; 13(1):145-50. PMC: 3918550. View

Tager-Flusberg H, Joseph R, Folstein S . Current directions in research on autism. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2001; 7(1):21-9. DOI: 10.1002/1098-2779(200102)7:1<21::AID-MRDD1004>3.0.CO;2-3. View

Pangalos C, Avramopoulos D, Blouin J, Raoul O, deBlois M, PRIEUR M . Understanding the mechanism(s) of mosaic trisomy 21 by using DNA polymorphism analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 1994; 54(3):473-81. PMC: 1918141. View

Woods D, Wyma J, Yund E, Herron T, Reed B . Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction time. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015; 9:131. PMC: 4374455. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00131. View

Donders F . On the speed of mental processes. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1969; 30:412-31. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(69)90065-1. View

Adam J, Paas F, Buekers M, Wuyts I, Spijkers W, Wallmeyer P . Gender differences in choice reaction time: evidence for differential strategies. Ergonomics. 1999; 42(2):327-35. DOI: 10.1080/001401399185685. View

10.

Chen K, Weng C, Hsiao S, Tsao W, Koo M . Cognitive decline and slower reaction time in elderly individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Psychogeriatrics. 2017; 17(6):364-370. DOI: 10.1111/psyg.12247. View

11.

Townsend J, Harris N, Courchesne E . Visual attention abnormalities in autism: delayed orienting to location. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1996; 2(6):541-50. DOI: 10.1017/s1355617700001715. View

12.

Der G, Deary I . Age and sex differences in reaction time in adulthood: results from the United Kingdom Health and Lifestyle Survey. Psychol Aging. 2006; 21(1):62-73. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.62. View

13.

Dickstein D, Treland J, Snow J, McClure E, Mehta M, Towbin K . Neuropsychological performance in pediatric bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2004; 55(1):32-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00701-7. View

14.

Surkar S, Hoffman R, Davies B, Harbourne R, Kurz M . Impaired anticipatory vision and visuomotor coordination affects action planning and execution in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil. 2018; 80:64-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.06.009. View

15.

Bryden P . Pushing the limits of task difficulty for the right and left hands in manual aiming. Brain Cogn. 2002; 48(2-3):287-91. View

16.

Darbutas T, Juodzbaliene V, Skurvydas A, Krisciunas A . Dependence of reaction time and movement speed on task complexity and age. Medicina (Kaunas). 2013; 49(1):18-22. View

17.

Inui N . Simple reaction times and timing of serial reactions of middle-aged and old men. Percept Mot Skills. 1997; 84(1):219-25. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1997.84.1.219. View

18.

Dane S, Erzurumluoglu A . Sex and handedness differences in eye-hand visual reaction times in handball players. Int J Neurosci. 2003; 113(7):923-9. DOI: 10.1080/00207450390220367. View

19.

Yi S, Hwang J, Kim S, Kwon J . Validity of pediatric balance scales in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Neuropediatrics. 2012; 43(6):307-13. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1327774. View

20.

Porciatti V, Fiorentini A, Morrone M, Burr D . The effects of ageing on reaction times to motion onset. Vision Res. 1999; 39(12):2157-64. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00288-0. View