Validity and Reliability of a Ruler Drop Test to Measure Dual-task Reaction Time, Choice Reaction Time and Discrimination Reaction Time

Overview

Journal Aging Clin Exp Res

Publisher Springer

Specialty Geriatrics

Date 2024 Mar 7

PMID 38451364

Authors

Soraia Ferreira

Armando Raimundo

Jesus Del Pozo-Cruz

Nilton Leite

Ana Pinto

Jose Marmeleira

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the absolute and relative reliability of the Ruler Drop Test (RDT) for assessing dual-task, choice, and discrimination reaction time. In addition, the construct validity of the RDT is examined in comparison to the Deary-Liewald reaction time (DLRT).

Methods: Tests were administered by the same evaluator, one week apart. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC3.1) was used to measure relative reliability, and the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC95) were used to measure absolute reliability. Spearman correlation test was used to measure construct validity.

Results: The results showed that the relative reliability was good for the choice ruler drop (ICC = 0.81), moderate for the dual-task ruler drop test (ICC = 0.70) and discrimination ruler drop test (ICC = 0.72), and good for simple ruler drop test. However, the simple ruler drop test had poor reliability (ICC = 0.57). The RDT shows construct validity compared to the DLRT.

Conclusion: We conclude that the RDT is a suitable instrument for measuring dual-task, choice and discrimination reaction time. Future studies should explore the reliability of these measures in other populations.

References

Deary I, Liewald D, Nissan J . A free, easy-to-use, computer-based simple and four-choice reaction time programme: the Deary-Liewald reaction time task. Behav Res Methods. 2011; 43(1):258-68. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-010-0024-1. View

Del Rossi G, Malaguti A, Del Rossi S . Practice effects associated with repeated assessment of a clinical test of reaction time. J Athl Train. 2014; 49(3):356-9. PMC: 4080596. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6059-49.2.04. View

Hopkins W . Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med. 2000; 30(1):1-15. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200030010-00001. View

Koo T, Li M . A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15(2):155-63. PMC: 4913118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. View

Callisaya M, Blizzard L, Schmidt M, McGinley J, Lord S, Srikanth V . A population-based study of sensorimotor factors affecting gait in older people. Age Ageing. 2009; 38(3):290-5. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afp017. View

Lundin-Olsson L, Nyberg L, Gustafson Y . "Stops walking when talking" as a predictor of falls in elderly people. Lancet. 1997; 349(9052):617. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)24009-2. View

Sturnieks D, Menant J, Vanrenterghem J, Delbaere K, Fitzpatrick R, Lord S . Sensorimotor and neuropsychological correlates of force perturbations that induce stepping in older adults. Gait Posture. 2012; 36(3):356-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.03.007. View

Nagamatsu L, Munkacsy M, Liu-Ambrose T, Handy T . Altered visual-spatial attention to task-irrelevant information is associated with falls risk in older adults. Neuropsychologia. 2014; 51(14):3025-32. PMC: 4318690. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.10.002. View

Weir J . Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 2005; 19(1):231-40. DOI: 10.1519/15184.1. View

10.

Ferreira S, Raimundo A, Del Pozo-Cruz J, Marmeleira J . Psychometric properties of a computerized and hand-reaction time tests in older adults using long-term facilities with and without mild cognitive impairment. Exp Gerontol. 2021; 147:111271. DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2021.111271. View

11.

Lord S, Rogers M, Howland A, Fitzpatrick R . Lateral stability, sensorimotor function and falls in older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999; 47(9):1077-81. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb05230.x. View

12.

Menz H, Lord S, Fitzpatrick R . Age-related differences in walking stability. Age Ageing. 2003; 32(2):137-42. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/32.2.137. View

13.

Ries J, Echternach J, Nof L, Gagnon Blodgett M . Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change scores for the timed "up & go" test, the six-minute walk test, and gait speed in people with Alzheimer disease. Phys Ther. 2009; 89(6):569-79. DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20080258. View

14.

Darbutas T, Juodzbaliene V, Skurvydas A, Krisciunas A . Dependence of reaction time and movement speed on task complexity and age. Medicina (Kaunas). 2013; 49(1):18-22. View

15.

Robbins T, James M, Owen A, Sahakian B, McInnes L, Rabbitt P . Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB): a factor analytic study of a large sample of normal elderly volunteers. Dementia. 1994; 5(5):266-81. DOI: 10.1159/000106735. View

16.

van Schooten K, Duran L, Visschedijk M, Pijnappels M, Lord S, Richardson J . Catch the ruler: concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of the ReacStick measures of reaction time and inhibitory executive function in older people. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2018; 31(8):1147-1154. DOI: 10.1007/s40520-018-1050-6. View

17.

Terwee C, Bot S, de Boer M, van der Windt D, Knol D, Dekker J . Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006; 60(1):34-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012. View

18.

Tiedemann A, Sherrington C, Lord S . Physical and psychological factors associated with stair negotiation performance in older people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007; 62(11):1259-65. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/62.11.1259. View

19.

Lord S, Murray S, Chapman K, Munro B, Tiedemann A . Sit-to-stand performance depends on sensation, speed, balance, and psychological status in addition to strength in older people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002; 57(8):M539-43. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/57.8.m539. View