Partial Word Knowledge in the Absence of Recall

Overview

Journal Mem Cognit

Specialty Psychology

Date 2013 May 7

PMID 23645392

Authors

Alan S Brown

Christopher N Burrows

Kathryn Croft Caderao

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Attributes of words can be known even when the words are not currently retrievable. Although repeatedly demonstrated for semantic and contextual dimensions, the evidence is ambiguous for structural characteristics. The present research demonstrates significant above-chance first-letter knowledge across four ordinal levels of retrieval confidence for nonretrieved words--tip of the tongue (TOT), high familiar, low familiar, unfamiliar. Contrary to prior research, there was minimal evidence for syllable number knowledge, even at highest confidence levels. Initial letter recognition in the absence of retrieval resembles the recognition without identification in episodic memory (Cleary, Current Directions in Psychological Science 17: 353-357, 2008), and such implicit familiarity may contribute more generally to confidence assessments of word knowledge in both semantic and episodic memory domains. Furthermore, this outcome suggests that word feature priming in the form of partial phonological activation may occur to some extent for all words during a retrieval attempt, and even for ones that are judged to be unknown.

References

Shore W, Kempe V . The role of sentence context in accessing partial knowledge of word meanings. J Psycholinguist Res. 1999; 28(2):145-63. DOI: 10.1023/a:1023258224980. View

Gollan T, Brown A . From tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) data to theoretical implications in two steps: when more TOTs means better retrieval. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006; 135(3):462-83. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.3.462. View

Kostic B, Cleary A . Song recognition without identification: when people cannot "name that tune" but can recognize it as familiar. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009; 138(1):146-59. DOI: 10.1037/a0014584. View

Wagovich S, Newhoff M . The single exposure: partial word knowledge growth through reading. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2005; 13(4):316-28. DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2004/032). View

Brown A, Nix L . Age-related changes in the tip-of-the-tongue experience. Am J Psychol. 1996; 109(1):79-91. View

Miozzo M, Caramazza A . Retrieval of lexical-syntactic features in tip-of-the-tongue states. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1998; 23(6):1410-23. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.23.6.1410. View

Heine M, Ober B, Shenaut G . Naturally occurring and experimentally induced tip-of-the-tongue experiences in three adult age groups. Psychol Aging. 1999; 14(3):445-57. DOI: 10.1037//0882-7974.14.3.445. View

Metcalfe J, Schwartz B, Joaquim S . The cue-familiarity heuristic in metacognition. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993; 19(4):851-61. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.19.4.851. View

Schwartz B, Travis D, Castro A, Smith S . The phenomenology of real and illusory tip-of-the-tongue states. Mem Cognit. 2000; 28(1):18-27. DOI: 10.3758/bf03211571. View

10.

Starns J, Hicks J, Brown N, Martin B . Source memory for unrecognized items: predictions from multivariate signal detection theory. Mem Cognit. 2008; 36(1):1-8. DOI: 10.3758/mc.36.1.1. View

11.

Schwartz B . Working memory load differentially affects tip-of-the-tongue states and feeling-of-knowing judgments. Mem Cognit. 2008; 36(1):9-19. DOI: 10.3758/mc.36.1.9. View

12.

Dew I, Cabeza R . The porous boundaries between explicit and implicit memory: behavioral and neural evidence. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011; 1224:174-190. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05946.x. View

13.

Biedermann B, Ruh N, Nickels L, Coltheart M . Information retrieval in Tip of the Tongue states: new data and methodological advances. J Psycholinguist Res. 2007; 37(3):171-98. DOI: 10.1007/s10936-007-9065-8. View

14.

Cleary A . Recognition with and without identification: dissociative effects of meaningful encoding. Mem Cognit. 2002; 30(5):758-67. DOI: 10.3758/bf03196431. View

15.

Cook G, Marsh R, Hicks J . Source memory in the absence of successful cued recall. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006; 32(4):828-35. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.828. View

16.

Gollan T, Acenas L . What is a TOT? Cognate and translation effects on tip-of-the-tongue states in Spanish-English and tagalog-English bilinguals. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004; 30(1):246-69. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.246. View

17.

Kurilla B, Westerman D . Source memory for unidentified stimuli. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010; 36(2):398-410. DOI: 10.1037/a0018279. View

18.

Cleary A . Relating familiarity-based recognition and the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: detecting a word's recency in the absence of access to the word. Mem Cognit. 2006; 34(4):804-16. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193428. View

19.

Smith S, Balfour S, Brown J . Effects of practice on tip-of-the-tongue states. Memory. 1994; 2(1):31-49. DOI: 10.1080/09658219408251491. View

20.

Clary A, Specker L . Recognition without face identification. Mem Cognit. 2007; 35(7):1610-9. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193495. View