» Articles » PMID: 12219892

Recognition with and Without Identification: Dissociative Effects of Meaningful Encoding

Overview
Journal Mem Cognit
Specialty Psychology
Date 2002 Sep 11
PMID 12219892
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In a series of four experiments, the effects of levels of processing and generation on the recognition of identified versus unidentified word fragments were examined. After studying a list of words, participants took a word fragment completion test in which half of the fragments came from studied words and half came from nonstudied words. Regardless of whether they could complete a given fragment, the participants were asked to rate the likelihood that it came from a studied word. Recognition of identified fragments was best whenever the focus of the encoding task was on meaning. Recognition of unidentified fragments did not benefit from meaningful encoding in any of the experiments reported here but did benefit from generation. It is suggested that whereas recognition with identification involves the use of meaning, recognition without identification involves the use of abstract orthographic information in memory.

Citing Articles

Detecting a familiar person behind the surgical mask: recognition without identification among masked versus sunglasses-covered faces.

Carlaw B, Huebert A, McNeely-White K, Rhodes M, Cleary A Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022; 7(1):90.

PMID: 36195737 PMC: 9531854. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-022-00440-3.


Mojibake - The rehearsal of word fragments in verbal recall.

Lange-Kuttner C, Sykorova E Front Psychol. 2015; 6:350.

PMID: 25941500 PMC: 4399214. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00350.


Partial word knowledge in the absence of recall.

Brown A, Burrows C, Croft Caderao K Mem Cognit. 2013; 41(7):967-77.

PMID: 23645392 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-013-0321-x.


Olfactory working memory: effects of verbalization on the 2-back task.

Jonsson F, Moller P, Olsson M Mem Cognit. 2011; 39(6):1023-32.

PMID: 21369969 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0080-5.


Odor recognition without identification.

Cleary A, Konkel K, Nomi J, McCabe D Mem Cognit. 2010; 38(4):452-60.

PMID: 20516225 DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.4.452.


References
1.
Mackay D, Abrams L . Age-linked declines in retrieving orthographic knowledge: empirical, practical, and theoretical implications. Psychol Aging. 1999; 13(4):647-62. DOI: 10.1037//0882-7974.13.4.647. View

2.
Dark V . Semantic priming, prime reportability, and retroactive priming are interdependent. Mem Cognit. 1988; 16(4):299-308. DOI: 10.3758/bf03197040. View

3.
Malmberg K, Steyvers M, Stephens J, Shiffrin R . Feature frequency effects in recognition memory. Mem Cognit. 2002; 30(4):607-13. DOI: 10.3758/bf03194962. View

4.
Weldon M . Mechanisms underlying priming on perceptual tests. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1991; 17(3):526-41. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.17.3.526. View

5.
GREENWALD A, Klinger M, Schuh E . Activation by marginally perceptible ("subliminal") stimuli: dissociation of unconscious from conscious cognition. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1995; 124(1):22-42. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.124.1.22. View