» Articles » PMID: 23637459

Multiple Alcohol Dehydrogenases but No Functional Acetaldehyde Dehydrogenase Causing Excessive Acetaldehyde Production from Ethanol by Oral Streptococci

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2013 May 3
PMID 23637459
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ethanol consumption and poor oral hygiene are risk factors for oral and oesophageal cancers. Although oral streptococci have been found to produce excessive acetaldehyde from ethanol, little is known about the mechanism by which this carcinogen is produced. By screening 52 strains of diverse oral streptococcal species, we identified Streptococcus gordonii V2016 that produced the most acetaldehyde from ethanol. We then constructed gene deletion mutants in this strain and analysed them for alcohol and acetaldehyde dehydrogenases by zymograms. The results showed that S. gordonii V2016 expressed three primary alcohol dehydrogenases, AdhA, AdhB and AdhE, which all oxidize ethanol to acetaldehyde, but their preferred substrates were 1-propanol, 1-butanol and ethanol, respectively. Two additional dehydrogenases, S-AdhA and TdhA, were identified with specificities to the secondary alcohol 2-propanol and threonine, respectively, but not to ethanol. S. gordonii V2016 did not show a detectable acetaldehyde dehydrogenase even though its adhE gene encodes a putative bifunctional acetaldehyde/alcohol dehydrogenase. Mutants with adhE deletion showed greater tolerance to ethanol in comparison with the wild-type and mutant with adhA or adhB deletion, indicating that AdhE is the major alcohol dehydrogenase in S. gordonii. Analysis of 19 additional strains of S. gordonii, S. mitis, S. oralis, S. salivarius and S. sanguinis showed expressions of up to three alcohol dehydrogenases, but none showed detectable acetaldehyde dehydrogenase, except one strain that showed a novel ALDH. Therefore, expression of multiple alcohol dehydrogenases but no functional acetaldehyde dehydrogenase may contribute to excessive production of acetaldehyde from ethanol by certain oral streptococci.

Citing Articles

Microbial signatures in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: an in silico study.

Kavitha L, Kuzhalmozhi M, Priyadharsini J, Arun Kumar A, Umadevi K, Ranganathan K J Appl Oral Sci. 2025; 33:e20240392.

PMID: 39907412 PMC: 11816647. DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2024-0392.


Oral microbiota and gastric cancer: recent highlights and knowledge gaps.

Xia R, Jiang Z, Zhou Y, Pan L, Wang Y, Ma Y J Oral Microbiol. 2024; 16(1):2391640.

PMID: 39161727 PMC: 11332296. DOI: 10.1080/20002297.2024.2391640.


An Overview of the Dichotomous Role of Microbiota in Cancer Progression and Management.

Jain P, Mohapatra S, Farooq U, Hassan N, Aamir Mirza M, Iqbal Z Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2024; 25(1):38-48.

PMID: 38409691 DOI: 10.2174/0115680096282503240124104029.


Oral Bacteria, Virus and Fungi in Saliva and Tissue Samples from Adult Subjects with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Umbrella Review.

Di Spirito F, Di Palo M, Folliero V, Cannata D, Franci G, Martina S Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(23).

PMID: 38067244 PMC: 10705713. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15235540.


Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Reveals the Molecular Mechanisms of Acetic Acid Reduction by Adding NaHSO in GXAS137.

Li S, Song C, Zhang H, Qin Y, Jiang M, Shen N Pol J Microbiol. 2023; 72(4):399-411.

PMID: 38000010 PMC: 10725169. DOI: 10.33073/pjm-2023-036.


References
1.
Lindler L, Macrina F . Characterization of genetic transformation in Streptococcus mutans by using a novel high-efficiency plasmid marker rescue system. J Bacteriol. 1986; 166(2):658-65. PMC: 214655. DOI: 10.1128/jb.166.2.658-665.1986. View

2.
Uittamo J, Siikala E, Kaihovaara P, Salaspuro M, Rautemaa R . Chronic candidosis and oral cancer in APECED-patients: production of carcinogenic acetaldehyde from glucose and ethanol by Candida albicans. Int J Cancer. 2008; 124(3):754-6. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.23976. View

3.
Hiyama T, Yoshihara M, Tanaka S, Chayama K . Genetic polymorphisms and esophageal cancer risk. Int J Cancer. 2007; 121(8):1643-58. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.23044. View

4.
Nnyepi M, Peng Y, Broderick J . Inactivation of E. coli pyruvate formate-lyase: role of AdhE and small molecules. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2007; 459(1):1-9. PMC: 2637557. DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2006.12.024. View

5.
Ranhand J . Simple, inexpensive procedure for the disruption of bacteria. Appl Microbiol. 1974; 28(1):66-9. PMC: 186592. DOI: 10.1128/am.28.1.66-69.1974. View