» Articles » PMID: 23626737

The Roles of Dehumanization and Moral Outrage in Retributive Justice

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Apr 30
PMID 23626737
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When innocents are intentionally harmed, people are motivated to see that offenders get their "just deserts". The severity of the punishment they seek is driven by the perceived magnitude of the harm and moral outrage. The present research extended this model of retributive justice by incorporating the role of offender dehumanization. In three experiments relying on survey methodology in Australia and the United States, participants read about different crimes that varied by type (child molestation, violent, or white collar - Studies 1 and 2) or severity (Study 3). The findings demonstrated that both moral outrage and dehumanization predicted punishment independently of the effects of crime type or crime severity. Both moral outrage and dehumanization mediated the relationship between perceived harm and severity of punishment. These findings highlight the role of offender dehumanization in punishment decisions and extend our understanding of processes implicated in retributive justice.

Citing Articles

Humanizing the Transgressor and Lightening the Immoral Behavior: The Role of Likeability Bias and Moral Rationalization.

Moreno-Gata S, Rodriguez-Torres R, Betancor V, Rodriguez-Perez A Behav Sci (Basel). 2025; 14(12.

PMID: 39767347 PMC: 11673505. DOI: 10.3390/bs14121206.


Attribution of undesirable character traits, rather than trait-based dehumanization, predicts punishment decisions.

Brennan R, Enock F, Over H R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(7):240087.

PMID: 39021773 PMC: 11251770. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.240087.


Understanding the support for gender-based harassment perpetrators: the role of closeness and empathy.

Borges-Castells N, Betancor V, Rodriguez-Perez A Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1418404.

PMID: 38993338 PMC: 11236737. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1418404.


The effect of wrongdoer's status on observer punishment recommendations: the mediating role of envy and the moderating role of belief in a just world.

Lin Z, Cui F, Wu Y, Wei Q Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1227961.

PMID: 38425565 PMC: 10902064. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1227961.


Cultural variations in perceptions and reactions to social norm transgressions: a comparative study.

Chen-Xia X, Betancor V, Rodriguez-Gomez L, Rodriguez-Perez A Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1243955.

PMID: 37799515 PMC: 10548130. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1243955.


References
1.
Haslam N . Dehumanization: an integrative review. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006; 10(3):252-64. DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4. View

2.
Leidner B, Castano E, Zaiser E, Giner-Sorolla R . Ingroup glorification, moral disengagement, and justice in the context of collective violence. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010; 36(8):1115-29. DOI: 10.1177/0146167210376391. View

3.
Alicke M . Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychol Bull. 2000; 126(4):556-74. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.4.556. View

4.
Hodson G, Costello K . Interpersonal disgust, ideological orientations, and dehumanization as predictors of intergroup attitudes. Psychol Sci. 2007; 18(8):691-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01962.x. View

5.
Harris L, Fiske S . Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: neuroimaging responses to extreme out-groups. Psychol Sci. 2006; 17(10):847-53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01793.x. View