» Articles » PMID: 16133946

The Role of Moral Disengagement in the Execution Process

Overview
Journal Law Hum Behav
Date 2005 Sep 1
PMID 16133946
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study tested the proposition that disengagement of moral self-sanctions enables prison personnel to carry out the death penalty. Three subgroups of personnel in penitentiaries located in three Southern states were assessed in terms of eight mechanisms of moral disengagement. The personnel included the execution teams that carry out the executions; the support teams that provide solace and emotional support to the families of the victims and the condemned inmate; and prison guards who have no involvement in the execution process. The executioners exhibited the highest level of moral, social, and economic justifications, disavowal of personal responsibility, and dehumanization. The support teams that provide the more humane services disavowed moral disengagement, as did the noninvolved guards but to a lesser degree than the support teams.

Citing Articles

Humanizing the Transgressor and Lightening the Immoral Behavior: The Role of Likeability Bias and Moral Rationalization.

Moreno-Gata S, Rodriguez-Torres R, Betancor V, Rodriguez-Perez A Behav Sci (Basel). 2025; 14(12.

PMID: 39767347 PMC: 11673505. DOI: 10.3390/bs14121206.


The indirect effect of compassion on katagelasticism: the mediatiang role of moral disengagement and the moderating effect of intolerance of uncertainty.

Maftei A BMC Psychol. 2023; 11(1):26.

PMID: 36703187 PMC: 9877495. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-023-01063-z.


How beliefs and unpleasant emotions direct cyberbullying intentions.

Ferreira P, Veiga Simao A, Martinho V, Pereira N Heliyon. 2022; 8(12):e12163.

PMID: 36536912 PMC: 9758407. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12163.


Experiences and perceptions of coercive practices in mental health care among service users in Nigeria: a qualitative study.

Aluh D, Ayilara O, Onu J, Grigaite U, Pedrosa B, Santos-Dias M Int J Ment Health Syst. 2022; 16(1):54.

PMID: 36424651 PMC: 9694572. DOI: 10.1186/s13033-022-00565-4.


Examining the effect of religiosity, moral disengagement, personal attribution, comprehension and proximity on juror decision making regarding insanity pleas.

Tate B, Yelderman L Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2022; 29(6):809-831.

PMID: 36267606 PMC: 9578477. DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1982789.