Understanding the Support for Gender-based Harassment Perpetrators: the Role of Closeness and Empathy

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2024 Jul 12

PMID 38993338

Authors

Nira Borges-Castells

Veronica Betancor

Armando Rodriguez-Perez

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Gender-based harassment is a pressing social challenge urgently demanding eradication. While social movements emphasize supporting victims, societal responses sometimes lean toward exculpating perpetrators. This study examines two factors influencing this exoneration: closeness to perpetrators and empathy focus.

Methods: A total of 345 participants took part in an experimental design to assess how closeness to perpetrators (close vs. distant) and empathy focus (on the perpetrator vs. victim vs. control) impact the moral justification of harassment and the dehumanization of both parties.

Results And Discussion: Results indicate that closeness and empathizing with perpetrators lead to greater leniency-more moral justification and less dehumanization of the perpetrator. Heightened moral justification for close perpetrators is mediated by increased empathy toward them and decreased empathy for victims, and reduced dehumanization of close perpetrators corresponds to heightened empathy toward them. This research highlights how closeness and empathy, two initially positive factors, can foster tolerance toward gender harassment.

References

Leskinen E, Cortina L, Kabat D . Gender harassment: broadening our understanding of sex-based harassment at work. Law Hum Behav. 2010; 35(1):25-39. DOI: 10.1007/s10979-010-9241-5. View

Galinsky A, Moskowitz G . Perspective-taking: decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000; 78(4):708-24. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.4.708. View

Murray C, Calderon C, Bahamondes J . Modern Rape Myths: Justifying Victim and Perpetrator Blame in Sexual Violence. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(3). PMC: 9914422. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20031663. View

Gachter S, Starmer C, Tufano F . Measuring the Closeness of Relationships: A Comprehensive Evaluation of the 'Inclusion of the Other in the Self' Scale. PLoS One. 2015; 10(6):e0129478. PMC: 4466912. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129478. View

Page T, Pina A, Giner-Sorolla R . "It was only harmless banter!" The development and preliminary validation of the moral disengagement in sexual harassment scale. Aggress Behav. 2015; 42(3):254-73. DOI: 10.1002/ab.21621. View

Decety J, Svetlova M . Putting together phylogenetic and ontogenetic perspectives on empathy. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2012; 2(1):1-24. PMC: 6987713. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2011.05.003. View

Chapleau K, Oswald D . A system justification view of sexual violence: legitimizing gender inequality and reduced moral outrage are connected to greater rape myth acceptance. J Trauma Dissociation. 2013; 15(2):204-18. DOI: 10.1080/15299732.2014.867573. View

Diehl C, Glaser T, Bohner G . Face the consequences: learning about victim's suffering reduces sexual harassment myth acceptance and men's likelihood to sexually harass. Aggress Behav. 2014; 40(6):489-503. DOI: 10.1002/ab.21553. View

Batson C, Polycarpou M, Harmon-Jones E, Imhoff H, Mitchener E, Bednar L . Empathy and attitudes: can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group?. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997; 72(1):105-18. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.72.1.105. View

10.

Vasquez E, Loughnan S, Gootjes-Dreesbach E, Weger U . The animal in you: animalistic descriptions of a violent crime increase punishment of perpetrator. Aggress Behav. 2014; 40(4):337-44. DOI: 10.1002/ab.21525. View

11.

Bastian B, Denson T, Haslam N . The roles of dehumanization and moral outrage in retributive justice. PLoS One. 2013; 8(4):e61842. PMC: 3633929. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061842. View

12.

Gevers A, Dartnall E . The role of mental health in primary prevention of sexual and gender-based violence. Glob Health Action. 2014; 7:24741. PMC: 4165042. DOI: 10.3402/gha.v7.24741. View

13.

Hedrick A . A Meta-analysis of Media Consumption and Rape Myth Acceptance. J Health Commun. 2021; 26(9):645-656. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2021.1986609. View

14.

Haslam N . Dehumanization: an integrative review. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006; 10(3):252-64. DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4. View

15.

Cheng Y, Chen C, Lin C, Chou K, Decety J . Love hurts: an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2010; 51(2):923-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.047. View

16.

Gray H, Gray K, Wegner D . Dimensions of mind perception. Science. 2007; 315(5812):619. DOI: 10.1126/science.1134475. View

17.

Decety J, Jackson P . The functional architecture of human empathy. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev. 2004; 3(2):71-100. DOI: 10.1177/1534582304267187. View

18.

LERNER M . EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE AS A FUNCTION OF PERFORMER'S REWARD AND ATTRACTIVENESS. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1965; 1:355-60. DOI: 10.1037/h0021806. View

19.

Decety J, Cowell J . Friends or Foes: Is Empathy Necessary for Moral Behavior?. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014; 9(5):525-37. PMC: 4241340. DOI: 10.1177/1745691614545130. View

20.

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A, Buchner A . G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39(2):175-91. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193146. View