» Articles » PMID: 23593337

Assessing the Effects of Aedes Aegypti Kdr Mutations on Pyrethroid Resistance and Its Fitness Cost

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Apr 18
PMID 23593337
Citations 98
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pyrethroids are the most used insecticide class worldwide. They target the voltage gated sodium channel (NaV), inducing the knockdown effect. In Aedes aegypti, the main dengue vector, the AaNaV substitutions Val1016Ile and Phe1534Cys are the most important knockdown resistance (kdr) mutations. We evaluated the fitness cost of these kdr mutations related to distinct aspects of development and reproduction, in the absence of any other major resistance mechanism. To accomplish this, we initially set up 68 crosses with mosquitoes from a natural population. Allele-specific PCR revealed that one couple, the one originating the CIT-32 strain, had both parents homozygous for both kdr mutations. However, this pyrethroid resistant strain also presented high levels of detoxifying enzymes, which synergistically account for resistance, as revealed by biological and biochemical assays. Therefore, we carried out backcrosses between CIT-32 and Rockefeller (an insecticide susceptible strain) for eight generations in order to bring the kdr mutation into a susceptible genetic background. This new strain, named Rock-kdr, was highly resistant to pyrethroid and presented reduced alteration of detoxifying activity. Fitness of the Rock-kdr was then evaluated in comparison with Rockefeller. In this strain, larval development took longer, adults had an increased locomotor activity, fewer females laid eggs, and produced a lower number of eggs. Under an inter-strain competition scenario, the Rock-kdr larvae developed even slower. Moreover, when Rockefeller and Rock-kdr were reared together in population cage experiments during 15 generations in absence of insecticide, the mutant allele decreased in frequency. These results strongly suggest that the Ae. aegypti kdr mutations have a high fitness cost. Therefore, enhanced surveillance for resistance should be priority in localities where the kdr mutation is found before new adaptive alleles can be selected for diminishing the kdr deleterious effects.

Citing Articles

Long-Term Exposure to Lambda-Cyhalothrin Reveals Novel Genes Potentially Involved in Insecticide Resistance.

Mejia A, Mejia-Jaramillo A, Fernandez G, Granada Y, Lowenberger C, Triana-Chavez O Insects. 2025; 16(2).

PMID: 40003736 PMC: 11855735. DOI: 10.3390/insects16020106.


Evaluation of Yellow Fever Virus Infection in Mosquitoes from Pakistan with Distinct Knockdown Resistance Genotypes.

Dos Santos C, Guedes Miranda Dos Santos C, Couto-Lima D, Souza B, Rahman R, Dornelas Ribeiro M Insects. 2025; 16(1.

PMID: 39859614 PMC: 11765701. DOI: 10.3390/insects16010033.


Insecticide resistance mutations of Anopheles species in the Republic of Korea.

Jeon J, Kim H, Klein T, Jun H, Choi K PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025; 19(1):e0012748.

PMID: 39774408 PMC: 11706468. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012748.


First detection of the S989P+V1016G+D1763Y haplotype and expansion of voltage-gated sodium channel mutations in Aedes aegypti in Taiwan in 2016-2023.

Chung H, Teng H, Huang C, Tsai I, Chen H, Komagata O PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025; 19(1):e0012768.

PMID: 39761287 PMC: 11737850. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012768.


Insecticide resistance status and mechanisms in Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus from different dengue endemic regions of Panama.

Carrera L, Piedra L, Torres-Cosme R, Castillo A, Bruno A, Ramirez J Trop Med Health. 2024; 52(1):69.

PMID: 39385264 PMC: 11462824. DOI: 10.1186/s41182-024-00637-w.


References
1.
Guzman M, Halstead S, Artsob H, Buchy P, Farrar J, Gubler D . Dengue: a continuing global threat. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010; 8(12 Suppl):S7-16. PMC: 4333201. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro2460. View

2.
Foster S, Young S, Williamson M, Duce I, Denholm I, Devine G . Analogous pleiotropic effects of insecticide resistance genotypes in peach-potato aphids and houseflies. Heredity (Edinb). 2003; 91(2):98-106. DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800285. View

3.
Verhaeghen K, Van Bortel W, Roelants P, Okello P, Talisuna A, Coosemans M . Spatio-temporal patterns in kdr frequency in permethrin and DDT resistant Anopheles gambiae s.s. from Uganda. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010; 82(4):566-73. PMC: 2844549. DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.08-0668. View

4.
Belinato T, Martins A, Valle D . Fitness evaluation of two Brazilian Aedes aegypti field populations with distinct levels of resistance to the organophosphate temephos. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2012; 107(7):916-22. DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02762012000700013. View

5.
Marcombe S, Poupardin R, Darriet F, Reynaud S, Bonnet J, Strode C . Exploring the molecular basis of insecticide resistance in the dengue vector Aedes aegypti: a case study in Martinique Island (French West Indies). BMC Genomics. 2009; 10:494. PMC: 2770535. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-494. View