Assessing the Contribution of Parks to Physical Activity Using Global Positioning System and Accelerometry

Overview

Journal Med Sci Sports Exerc

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2013 Mar 28

PMID 23531716

Citations 56

Authors

Kelly R Evenson

Fang Wen

Amy Hillier

Deborah A Cohen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Parks offer a free option for physical activity in many communities. How much time people spend using parks and the contribution that parks makes to their physical activity is not known. This study describes patterns of park use and physical activity among a diverse adult sample.

Methods: From five US states, 248 adults enrolled in or near 31 study parks. Participants wore a global positioning system (GPS) monitor (Qstarz BT-Q1000X) and an ActiGraph accelerometer (GT1M) concurrently for 3 wk. Parks were mapped from local and national park shape files. Park visits and travel to and from the parks were derived from the objective data.

Results: Participants visited parks a median of 2.3 times per week, and park visits lasted a median of 42.0 min. Overall, participants engaged in a median of 21.7 min·d-1 of moderate activity and 0.1 min·d-1 of vigorous activity, with an average of 8.2% of all moderate and 9.4% of all vigorous activity occurring within the parks. Among those with at least one park visit (n = 218), counts per minute, moderate, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), number and time in MVPA bouts per day, and sedentary behavior were all higher on days when a park was visited compared with days when a park was not visited. Considering several definitions of active travel, walking or bicycling to and from the park added an additional 3.7-6.6 mean minutes of MVPA per park visit.

Conclusions: Parks contributed as a place and destination for physical activity but were underused. One of the next steps in this line of inquiry is to understand characteristics of parks used more often as a place and destination for physical activity.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the impact of added greenery on perceived factors of an urban environment in virtual reality.

Bar-Ad R, Vigo M, Caruso G, Quboa Q, Pinto N PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0316195.

PMID: 39913470 PMC: 11801589. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316195.

Interrelationships and Trade-Offs between Urban Natural Space Use and Biodiversity.

Prioreschi E, Zimmermann N, Davies M, Pluchinotta I Sustainability. 2024; 16(10):4051.

PMID: 39416422 PMC: 7616704. DOI: 10.3390/su16104051.

Associations of Park Use with Physical Activity in Renovated Parks Serving Low-Income Communities in New York City: Insights from the Community Parks Initiative.

Olivera Leon L, Thompson R, Wyka K, Huang T J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024; .

PMID: 39177725 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-024-02095-w.

Identifying multilevel predictors of behavioral outcomes like park use: A comparison of conditional and marginal modeling approaches.

Wende M, Hughey S, McLain A, Hallum S, Hipp J, Schipperijn J PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0301549.

PMID: 38626162 PMC: 11020402. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301549.

What Is the Contribution of Community Programs to the Physical Activity of Women? A Study Based on Public Open Spaces in Brazil.

Funez E, da Silva A, Dos Santos L, Rodriguez-Anez C, Silva A, Fermino R Behav Sci (Basel). 2023; 13(9).

PMID: 37753996 PMC: 10525197. DOI: 10.3390/bs13090718.

References

Cohen D, Setodji C, Evenson K, Ward P, Lapham S, Hillier A . How much observation is enough? Refining the administration of SOPARC. J Phys Act Health. 2011; 8(8):1117-23. PMC: 3689589. DOI: 10.1123/jpah.8.8.1117. View

Jones A, Coombes E, Griffin S, van Sluijs E . Environmental supportiveness for physical activity in English schoolchildren: a study using Global Positioning Systems. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009; 6:42. PMC: 2729291. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-6-42. View

Wheeler B, Cooper A, Page A, Jago R . Greenspace and children's physical activity: a GPS/GIS analysis of the PEACH project. Prev Med. 2010; 51(2):148-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.06.001. View

Lachowycz K, Jones A, Page A, Wheeler B, Cooper A . What can global positioning systems tell us about the contribution of different types of urban greenspace to children's physical activity?. Health Place. 2012; 18(3):586-94. PMC: 3796217. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.01.006. View

Maddison R, Ni Mhurchu C . Global positioning system: a new opportunity in physical activity measurement. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009; 6:73. PMC: 2777117. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-6-73. View

Malta D, Barbosa da Silva J . Policies to promote physical activity in Brazil. Lancet. 2012; 380(9838):195-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61041-1. View

Tilt J . Walking trips to parks: exploring demographic, environmental factors, and preferences for adults with children in the household. Prev Med. 2009; 50 Suppl 1:S69-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.026. View

Walker J, Mowen A, Hendricks W, Kruger J, Morrow Jr J, Bricker K . Physical activity in the park setting (PA-PS) questionnaire: reliability in a California statewide sample. J Phys Act Health. 2009; 6 Suppl 1:S97-104. DOI: 10.1123/jpah.6.s1.s97. View

Boone-Heinonen J, Jacobs Jr D, Sidney S, Sternfeld B, Lewis C, Gordon-Larsen P . A walk (or cycle) to the park: active transit to neighborhood amenities, the CARDIA study. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 37(4):285-92. PMC: 2881319. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.06.006. View

10.

Leenders N, Nelson T, Sherman W . Ability of different physical activity monitors to detect movement during treadmill walking. Int J Sports Med. 2003; 24(1):43-50. DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-37196. View

11.

Troiano R, Berrigan D, Dodd K, Masse L, Tilert T, McDowell M . Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007; 40(1):181-8. DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31815a51b3. View

12.

Lee I, Shiroma E, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair S, Katzmarzyk P . Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012; 380(9838):219-29. PMC: 3645500. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9. View

13.

Evenson K, Wen F . Using geographic information systems to compare municipal, county, and commercial parks data. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013; 10:E93. PMC: 3682810. DOI: 10.5888/pcd10.120265. View

14.

Krenn P, Titze S, Oja P, Jones A, Ogilvie D . Use of global positioning systems to study physical activity and the environment: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2011; 41(5):508-15. PMC: 3821057. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.06.046. View

15.

Matthew C . Calibration of accelerometer output for adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005; 37(11 Suppl):S512-22. DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000185659.11982.3d. View

16.

Cohen D, Golinelli D, Williamson S, Sehgal A, Marsh T, McKenzie T . Effects of park improvements on park use and physical activity: policy and programming implications. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 37(6):475-80. PMC: 2821789. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.07.017. View

17.

Vuori I, Lankenau B, Pratt M . Physical activity policy and program development: the experience in Finland. Public Health Rep. 2004; 119(3):331-45. PMC: 1497635. DOI: 10.1016/j.phr.2004.04.012. View

18.

Yngve A, Nilsson A, Sjostrom M, Ekelund U . Effect of monitor placement and of activity setting on the MTI accelerometer output. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35(2):320-6. DOI: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000048829.75758.A0. View

19.

Matthews C, Chen K, Freedson P, Buchowski M, Beech B, Pate R . Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003-2004. Am J Epidemiol. 2008; 167(7):875-81. PMC: 3527832. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwm390. View

20.

Esliger D, Tremblay M . Technical reliability assessment of three accelerometer models in a mechanical setup. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006; 38(12):2173-81. DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000239394.55461.08. View