» Articles » PMID: 36360689

Inland Waterways and Population Health and Wellbeing: A Cross-Sectional Study of Waterway Users in the UK

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Nov 11
PMID 36360689
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Natural environments, such as inland waterways (IWs), have been identified as a potential means to increase physical activity and promote health and wellbeing. However, further information on predictors of IW usage and their relationship with health and wellbeing outcomes is needed. Data were taken from the cross-sectional UK Waterways Engagement Monitor survey of waterway users (n = 21,537) in 2019/2020. Health outcome measures were life satisfaction, physical activity, and mental wellbeing. Visit frequency was an additional outcome measure. Both bivariate and multivariable associations between outcome measures and features of IWs were explored. The travel-cost method was used to estimate users' demand, expressed by travel costs to waterways. Multivariable models showed positive associations of frequent visits and use for recreational/leisure purposes with life satisfaction and physical activity. Rural visits were associated with higher life satisfaction than urban ones. Lower visit satisfaction negatively impacted life satisfaction and mental wellbeing. Visit frequency was influenced by individual characteristics and purpose of visit, including visits for exercise. Waterway visits were inversely associated with travel costs (IRR = 0.99, -value ≤ 0.001), and there was greater demand elasticity for short distances (≤5 miles). Socioeconomic-related inequalities were present. Future policies could enhance frequent use of waterways and alleviate accessibility-related inequalities to improve population health outcomes.

References
1.
Cohen D, McKenzie T, Sehgal A, Williamson S, Golinelli D, Lurie N . Contribution of public parks to physical activity. Am J Public Health. 2007; 97(3):509-14. PMC: 1805017. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.072447. View

2.
Wheeler B, White M, Stahl-Timmins W, Depledge M . Does living by the coast improve health and wellbeing?. Health Place. 2012; 18(5):1198-201. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.06.015. View

3.
Mitchell R . Is physical activity in natural environments better for mental health than physical activity in other environments?. Soc Sci Med. 2012; 91:130-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.04.012. View

4.
Rigolon A, Browning M, McAnirlin O, Yoon H . Green Space and Health Equity: A Systematic Review on the Potential of Green Space to Reduce Health Disparities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(5). PMC: 7967323. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052563. View

5.
Pasanen T, White M, Wheeler B, Garrett J, Elliott L . Neighbourhood blue space, health and wellbeing: The mediating role of different types of physical activity. Environ Int. 2019; 131:105016. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105016. View