» Articles » PMID: 39177725

Associations of Park Use with Physical Activity in Renovated Parks Serving Low-Income Communities in New York City: Insights from the Community Parks Initiative

Overview
Date 2024 Aug 23
PMID 39177725
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Parks have the potential to encourage physical activity among urban communities. However, existing research on the link between park use and physical activity has produced inconsistent results. Mixed findings in the past may be due in part to differences in park quality across studies. The aim of this study was to explore the association between park use and physical activity among New York City adults in low-income communities that recently received city-sponsored park renovation as part of the Community Parks Initiative (CPI). Using population-weighted survey data from eight neighborhoods with recent park renovation (n = 2,000), we measured associations between park use frequency (≥ once/week vs. < once/week) and self-reported physical activity (high vs. low-moderate based on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire). We adjusted models for age, sex, education, race/ethnicity, income, study site, and use of other (non-CPI) parks, and conducted stratified analysis for demographic variables with significant interactions with park use. After adjusting for covariates, we observed a positive association between park use and physical activity (prevalence ratio [PR] = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.16-1.46). Greater frequency of park use was more strongly associated with high physical activity among adults ≤ 50 y (PR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.14-1.69), individuals with annual household income < $25,000 (PR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.13-2.08), and Latinos (PR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.44-2.18). Our findings suggest that high-quality parks might be particularly beneficial for promoting physical activity among those with a lower socioeconomic background and in younger and Latino adults, emphasizing the importance of continued investment in park revitalization among urban communities of color.

References
1.
Lee I, Shiroma E, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair S, Katzmarzyk P . Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012; 380(9838):219-29. PMC: 3645500. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9. View

2.
Bartley K, Eisenhower D, Harris T, Lee K . Accelerometer and Survey Data on Patterns of Physical Inactivity in New York City and the United States. Public Health Rep. 2019; 134(3):293-299. PMC: 6505331. DOI: 10.1177/0033354919841855. View

3.
Cohen D, Han B, Nagel C, Harnik P, McKenzie T, Evenson K . The First National Study of Neighborhood Parks: Implications for Physical Activity. Am J Prev Med. 2016; 51(4):419-26. PMC: 5030121. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.03.021. View

4.
Hartig T, Mitchell R, de Vries S, Frumkin H . Nature and health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014; 35:207-28. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443. View

5.
Richardson E, Pearce J, Mitchell R, Kingham S . Role of physical activity in the relationship between urban green space and health. Public Health. 2013; 127(4):318-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.01.004. View